Hello CCC folks !
Conditions:
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Books = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3
Tao 5.6 was linked to Nalimov TBs.
====================
For Mr.Dvorkin (and Donna - all versions ) : Moldova in winter with a friend of mine ! Love Lithuania !
https://youtu.be/83zRzlGVYdM
====================
Test no.1 (DiscoCheck w32 comparative)
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 4468
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
-
- Posts: 4468
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: Only if you are interested (Sting SF 6 w32 ) + a bonus
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Books = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3
Rybka 4.1 was linked to Nalimov TBs.
Sting SF 6 = an amazing chess engine !
Like bonuses:
1).- Something you have never seen before: my Moldavians in Ukraine:
=====================
https://youtu.be/UawRv0SKekY
=====================
2.)-The old IASI in winter:
-Hash = 128 MB
-Books = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3
Rybka 4.1 was linked to Nalimov TBs.
Sting SF 6 = an amazing chess engine !
Like bonuses:
1).- Something you have never seen before: my Moldavians in Ukraine:
=====================
https://youtu.be/UawRv0SKekY
=====================
2.)-The old IASI in winter:
-
- Posts: 4468
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: Stockfish comparative test (w32 ) + a super bonus
Hello !
Conditions:
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Book = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
Contempt = 0 (Komodo 9.3) in all three matches.
Both engines were linked to Syzygy Bases.
Being Sunday a very nice video with a dear friend of mine - from Suceava/Romania:
===================
https://youtu.be/Ff0dFL79Cog
===================
Conditions:
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Book = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
Contempt = 0 (Komodo 9.3) in all three matches.
Both engines were linked to Syzygy Bases.
Being Sunday a very nice video with a dear friend of mine - from Suceava/Romania:
===================
https://youtu.be/Ff0dFL79Cog
===================
-
- Posts: 4468
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: Andscacs 0.85 (w32) test
Hello !
Conditions:
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Books = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3
Shredder 12 UCI used Nalimov TBS & Shredderbases (loaded into the RAM memory).
Don't be sad Daniel ! Like compensation I'll post here a photo like you have never seen: my Moldavians in traditional clothes. Do you like it ?
Conditions:
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Books = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3
Shredder 12 UCI used Nalimov TBS & Shredderbases (loaded into the RAM memory).
Don't be sad Daniel ! Like compensation I'll post here a photo like you have never seen: my Moldavians in traditional clothes. Do you like it ?
-
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
- Location: Andorra
Re: Andscacs 0.85 (w32) test
Hi!
Thanks for the test. In this case even if does not seem it, this is a good result, as this new version of Andscacs seems clearly stronger at longer time control than the previous version 0.84, my objective.
Thanks for the test. In this case even if does not seem it, this is a good result, as this new version of Andscacs seems clearly stronger at longer time control than the previous version 0.84, my objective.
Daniel José - http://www.andscacs.com
-
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
- Location: Andorra
Re: Andscacs 0.85 (w32) test
The same happened here:cdani wrote:Hi!
Thanks for the test. In this case even if does not seem it, this is a good result, as this new version of Andscacs seems clearly stronger at longer time control than the previous version 0.84, my objective.
http://immortalchess.net/forum/showthread.php?p=648809
They have run some thousand games at 60+0.2 sec and the result was more or less the same for 0.85 and 0.84.
Daniel José - http://www.andscacs.com
-
- Posts: 4468
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: Andscacs 0.85 (w32) test
Well Daniel, my tests were always at TC = 4'+2" (around 12 minutes/game). I'll run a test at a long TC !cdani wrote:The same happened here:cdani wrote:Hi!
Thanks for the test. In this case even if does not seem it, this is a good result, as this new version of Andscacs seems clearly stronger at longer time control than the previous version 0.84, my objective.
http://immortalchess.net/forum/showthread.php?p=648809
They have run some thousand games at 60+0.2 sec and the result was more or less the same for 0.85 and 0.84.
-
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
- Location: Andorra
Re: Andscacs 0.85 (w32) test
It is not necessary! Was just a note But what you want, of course!! Anyway you will have difficulties to obtain anything significative, because I'm talking of very long time control, so better don't even trySylwy wrote:Well Daniel, my tests were always at TC = 4'+2" (around 12 minutes/game). I'll run a test at a long TC !cdani wrote:The same happened here:cdani wrote:Hi!
Thanks for the test. In this case even if does not seem it, this is a good result, as this new version of Andscacs seems clearly stronger at longer time control than the previous version 0.84, my objective.
http://immortalchess.net/forum/showthread.php?p=648809
They have run some thousand games at 60+0.2 sec and the result was more or less the same for 0.85 and 0.84.
Daniel José - http://www.andscacs.com
-
- Posts: 4468
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: Andscacs 0.85 (w32) test
OK !cdani wrote:It is not necessary! Was just a note But what you want, of course!! Anyway you will have difficulties to obtain anything significative, because I'm talking of very long time control, so better don't even trySylwy wrote:Well Daniel, my tests were always at TC = 4'+2" (around 12 minutes/game). I'll run a test at a long TC !cdani wrote:The same happened here:cdani wrote:Hi!
Thanks for the test. In this case even if does not seem it, this is a good result, as this new version of Andscacs seems clearly stronger at longer time control than the previous version 0.84, my objective.
http://immortalchess.net/forum/showthread.php?p=648809
They have run some thousand games at 60+0.2 sec and the result was more or less the same for 0.85 and 0.84.
-
- Posts: 4468
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: CeruleanJS 0.1.1 Blizzard (w32) test
Conditions:
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = both engines have fixed hash
-Books = Perfect_2010.abk (Toledo) and its own book (CeruleanJS)
-GUI = Arena 3.0
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3
+70 Elo points CCRL 4/40 for CeruleanJS w32 ! I can't see any strength difference between the 32-bit & 64-bit versions of this nice Javascript chess engine !
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = both engines have fixed hash
-Books = Perfect_2010.abk (Toledo) and its own book (CeruleanJS)
-GUI = Arena 3.0
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3
+70 Elo points CCRL 4/40 for CeruleanJS w32 ! I can't see any strength difference between the 32-bit & 64-bit versions of this nice Javascript chess engine !