Soberango 0.00.0 realized.

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

User avatar
Luis Babboni
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:37 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: Soberango 0.00.0 "tested"

Post by Luis Babboni »

supersharp77 wrote: Engine a bit buggy...tends to hang and not close after games ended..(use task mgr to close) works using only wb2uci adapter in Fritz and Lokasoft...(xboard and winboard gives no moves in lokasoft)...not quite a random mover..shows some ability (tactics) reasonable strength for a new engine..(needs some work)....rating based on some swiss games
1100-1300?!?! rough guess...AR :) :wink:

Soberango pgn games

http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=023 ... 5582231550
Thanks AA for your time!
I aclared here and in its website:
http://www.luisbtenis.com.ar/Soberango/Soberango.html
That for the moment just works fine in Arena (even in Arena crash if lost by time but in 5/0 or 40/4 do not happens)
:oops:
Have no tactic at all, just queen 900 points; rook 500; bishop and knigh 300 and pawn 100.
It played several games 40/4 with around 800/900 ELO points engines in CCRL and lost near all games. Use to win over 500/600.

What is 300+5 and 600/300+5:30/60+5:60+5?

Thanks again! :D

EDIT: its not lost by time in 5/0 or 40/4 in a Phenom 955 3200MHz. It not has time control at all, just search depth fixed in 5.
User avatar
Luis Babboni
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:37 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: Soberango 0.00.0 "tested"

Post by Luis Babboni »

Now Soberango takes care of the 50 moves rule:
http://www.luisbtenis.com.ar/Soberango/Soberango.html
Still left to know 3rd repetition rule (next target).
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4465
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: SilvianR

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by Sylwy »

User avatar
Luis Babboni
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:37 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by Luis Babboni »

Soberango 0.03.0 realized.

Now Soberango takes care of the 3rd repetition rule.

Fixed a bug of 0.02.1 that makes Soberango crash if the opponent start the very 1st game of a tournament in Arena with a pawn moving 2 squares.

http://www.luisbtenis.com.ar/Soberango/Soberango.html

Next step: recognition of insufficient material.
User avatar
Luis Babboni
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:37 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by Luis Babboni »

SzG wrote:
Luis Babboni wrote: Next step: recognition of insufficient material.
Be aware that different colour bishop KBKB's and KBKN's are not insufficient material. Many forget that.
Thanks!
Anywhere to find "official rules" about insufficient material?
petero2
Posts: 686
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 7:07 pm
Location: Sweden
Full name: Peter Osterlund

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by petero2 »

Luis Babboni wrote:
SzG wrote:
Luis Babboni wrote: Next step: recognition of insufficient material.
Be aware that different colour bishop KBKB's and KBKN's are not insufficient material. Many forget that.
Thanks!
Anywhere to find "official rules" about insufficient material?
There is no such thing as "insufficient material" in the official FIDE laws of chess. There is a concept called "dead position" though. From paragraph 5.2b:
The game is drawn when a position has arisen in which neither player can checkmate the opponent's king with any series of legal moves. The game is said to end in a 'dead position'. This immediately ends the game, provided that the move producing the position was in accordance with Article 3 and Articles 4.2 - 4.7.
It can be proven that for certain material configurations all legal positions are dead positions. Such material configurations are sometimes informally classified as "insufficient material".

It is not trivial to determine if a position is a dead position. For example, the following position is a dead position.
[D]4k3/8/p1p1p1p1/PpPpPpPp/1P1P1P1P/8/8/2B1K3 w - - 0 1
This seemingly similar position is not a dead position:
[D]4k3/8/p1p1p1p1/PpPpPpPp/1P1P1P1P/8/8/1B2K3 w - - 0 1
User avatar
Luis Babboni
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:37 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by Luis Babboni »

Thanks Peter!
I did not thougth in that kind of positions.
At my, low, amateur level, at this kind of positions we always just agree ties never thinking is must be tie. I mean, that could not be won by time neither, I´m right?

Could the best engines, having whites, avoid positions like those you showed?

EDIT: Arena do not declares tie the first position!
User avatar
Luis Babboni
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:37 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by Luis Babboni »

If the side wich have insufficient material (and the other not) "won" by time is tie, I´m right?
petero2
Posts: 686
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 7:07 pm
Location: Sweden
Full name: Peter Osterlund

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by petero2 »

Luis Babboni wrote:If the side wich have insufficient material (and the other not) "won" by time is tie, I'm right?
The official rules say something like that except that "insufficient material" is not defined by the rules. From paragraph 6.9:
... if a player does not complete the prescribed number of moves in the allotted time, the game is lost by that player. However, the game is drawn if the position is such that the opponent cannot checkmate the player's king by any possible series of legal moves.
User avatar
Luis Babboni
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:37 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by Luis Babboni »

Thanks Peter!