Soberango 0.00.0 realized.

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

User avatar
Luis Babboni
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:37 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by Luis Babboni »

Is this table correct?:
http://www.e4ec.org/immr.html

king and knight vs king and knight is not tie?

Thanks!
Top
User avatar
cdani
Posts: 2204
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
Location: Andorra

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by cdani »

Luis Babboni wrote:Is this table correct?:
http://www.e4ec.org/immr.html

king and knight vs king and knight is not tie?

Thanks!
Mate!

[d]kn6/2N5/1K6/8/8/8/8/8 b - - 0 1
Top
User avatar
Luis Babboni
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:37 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by Luis Babboni »

Thanks!

How you post those green boards?
Top
User avatar
cdani
Posts: 2204
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
Location: Andorra

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by cdani »

Luis Babboni wrote:Thanks!

How you post those green boards?
Just put [d] in front of the fen string.
Top
User avatar
Luis Babboni
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:37 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by Luis Babboni »

Except for many bishops over the same colour, all other "insufficient material" (not dead positions) could be solved using Tablebases, I´m right?

At least Gaviota solved this, capturing the pawn, using that way:

[d]7K/3N4/1b6/4p3/8/8/1k6/8 w - - 0 1
Top
User avatar
Luis Babboni
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:37 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by Luis Babboni »

Soberango 0.04.0 realized.

Now Soberango takes care of insufficient material.
http://www.luisbtenis.com.ar/Soberango/Soberango.html
Top
Sven
Posts: 4052
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 9:57 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany
Full name: Sven Schüle

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by Sven »

Luis Babboni wrote:Except for many bishops over the same colour, all other "insufficient material" (not dead positions) could be solved using Tablebases, I´m right?
Yes, that's right, since all other so-called "insufficient material" positions are at most 3-men positions: KK, KNK, KBK. But you don't need tablebases to solve these ... And you only need two rules to detect all "insufficient material" positions:
1) KNK
2) K and any number of same-colored bishops vs K (including zero bishops = KK and one bishop = KBK)

One should also note that the set of "insufficient material" positions is in fact a subset of those positions that are called "dead positions" by the FIDE rules.
Top
User avatar
Luis Babboni
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:37 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by Luis Babboni »

Thanks!
Top
User avatar
Luis Babboni
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:37 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by Luis Babboni »

Luis Babboni wrote:Is this table correct?:
http://www.e4ec.org/immr.html

king and knight vs king and knight is not tie?

Thanks!
This link do not said king + 2 knights vs king is tie but it is :(
Need to fix Soberango 0.04.0
Top
User avatar
Luis Babboni
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:37 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: My test (Soberango 0.02.0)

Post by Luis Babboni »

Luis Babboni wrote:
Luis Babboni wrote:Is this table correct?:
http://www.e4ec.org/immr.html

king and knight vs king and knight is not tie?

Thanks!
This link do not said king + 2 knights vs king is tie but it is :(
Need to fix Soberango 0.04.0
Fixed.
Soberango 0.04.1 uploaded:
http://www.luisbtenis.com.ar/Soberango/Soberango.html
Top

Return to “Computer Chess Club: General Topics”