The usual positions are similar to following:
[D]2r5/2p1rpkp/1p1p1qp1/pP1Q4/P1P1PP2/6PP/5R1K/5R2 w - - 1 51
[D]3r4/p4p1k/1pbr2p1/2nNp1q1/2P1P2p/P1Q1R2P/2P1BPP1/3R2K1 w - - 2 51
[D]3r2k1/1b2qppr/4p2p/pPnpP2P/P1p2N2/2P1R1P1/Q4PBK/3R4 w - - 25 51
The PGN of 1118 "opening" positions is here:
http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?fi ... 5634484625
The result was a bit surprising, Komodo 10.3 is ahead of a recent asmFish, which is stronger than Komodo 10.3 at this time control by 60-90 ELO points from regular openings:
Code: Select all
Games Completed = 1400 of 1400 (Avg game length = 124.367 sec)
Settings = RR/64MB/60000ms+600ms/M 500cp for 3 moves, D 120 moves/PGN:C:\LittleBlitzer\AtLeast6pawn.pgn(1118)
Time = 43690 sec elapsed, 0 sec remaining
1. Komodo 10.3 64-bit 219.0/350 134-46-170 (tpm=1558.3 d=25.97 nps=2302863)
2. asmFishW_2017-02-15_popcnt 209.5/350 120-51-179 (tpm=1505.3 d=29.28 nps=2960203)
3. Houdini 5.01 Pro x64-popc 199.5/350 107-58-185 (tpm=1511.6 d=22.30 nps=2744216)
4. Fire 5 x64 174.5/350 80-81-189 (tpm=1453.4 d=20.86 nps=2351251)
5. Deep Shredder 13 x64 170.0/350 79-89-182 (tpm=1681.2 d=28.12 nps=2481086)
6. Fizbo 1.9 164.5/350 78-99-173 (tpm=1664.6 d=19.85 nps=1912900)
7. Andscacs 0.89 139.5/350 50-121-179 (tpm=1544.7 d=23.85 nps=1523463)
8. Texel 1.06 123.5/350 43-146-161 (tpm=1602.0 d=18.39 nps=1968017)