OS: Windows 7 SP1
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @2.88GHz
GUI: Cutechess-cli 0.7.0
Openings: Noomen Testsuite 2016, based on the TCEC superfinal PGN
50 positions x2 (with different colours) = 100 games
TC: 600 sec + 10 sec (per move)
Engine #1: Komodo 10.4 C0 (contempt=0)
Engine #2: Stockfish 17032017 (bench=6128779, Ultimaiq's version)
Games: http://treu.ru/2017/k104_sf18032017_600_100_c0.pgn
Komodo 10.4 C0 vs. SF 17032017 4CPU 600+10
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm
-
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm
Re: Komodo 10.4 C0 vs. SF 17032017 4CPU 600+10
Code: Select all
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 Komodo 10.4 64-bit : 58 150 144 12 58.3 % 0 50.0 %
2 Stockfish 180317 64 : 0 144 150 12 41.7 % 58 50.0 %
1 Komodo 10.4 64-bit : 58 12 (+ 4,= 6,- 2), 58.3 %
2 Stockfish 180317 64 : 0 12 (+ 2,= 6,- 4), 41.7 %
-
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm
Re: Komodo 10.4 C0 vs. SF 17032017 4CPU 600+10
Forgot about the hash and TBs.
Hash: 1024 MB
EGTB: Syzygy 5-men
Hash: 1024 MB
EGTB: Syzygy 5-men
-
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm
Re: Komodo 10.4 C0 vs. SF 17032017 4CPU 600+10
Code: Select all
1 Komodo 10.4 64-bit : 0 18 (+ 4,= 10,- 4), 50.0 %
2 Stockfish 180317 64 : 0 18 (+ 4,= 10,- 4), 50.0 %
-
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm
Re: Komodo 10.4 C0 vs. SF 17032017 4CPU 600+10
After 20 games Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @2.88GHz was replaced by Intel® Xeon® Processor E3-1270 v5 @3.60GHz
New OS is Windows Server 2012 R2
New OS is Windows Server 2012 R2
-
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm
Re: Komodo 10.4 C0 vs. SF 17032017 4CPU 600+10
Komodo 10.4 vs. Stockfish 180317 64 BMI2 0:8 on new hardware:
Code: Select all
1 Stockfish 180317 64 BMI2 : 167 22 (+ 8,= 14,- 0), 68.2 %
2 Komodo 10.4 64-bit : 36 42 (+ 6,= 24,- 12), 42.9 %
Stockfish 180317 64 : 20 (+ 6,= 10,- 4), 55.0 %
Stockfish 180317 64 BMI2 : 22 (+ 0,= 14,- 8), 31.8 %
3 Stockfish 180317 64 : 0 20 (+ 4,= 10,- 6), 45.0 %
-
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm
Re: Komodo 10.4 C0 vs. SF 17032017 4CPU 600+10
After 42 games:
Code: Select all
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 Stockfish 180317 64 : 50 70 69 42 57.1 % 0 57.1 %
2 Komodo 10.4 64-bit : 0 69 70 42 42.9 % 50 57.1 %
1 Stockfish 180317 64 : 50 42 (+ 12,= 24,- 6), 57.1 %
2 Komodo 10.4 64-bit : 0 42 (+ 6,= 24,- 12), 42.9 %
-
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm
Re: Komodo 10.4 C0 vs. SF 17032017 4CPU 600+10
After 51 games:
Code: Select all
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 Stockfish 180317 64 : 54 64 62 51 57.8 % 0 56.9 %
2 Komodo 10.4 64-bit : 0 62 64 51 42.2 % 54 56.9 %
1 Stockfish 180317 64 : 54 51 (+ 15,= 29,- 7), 57.8 %
2 Komodo 10.4 64-bit : 0 51 (+ 7,= 29,- 15), 42.2 %
-
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm
Re: Komodo 10.4 C0 vs. SF 17032017 4CPU 600+10
It displays "1803", but it's a date of compile.majortom wrote:Stockfish 180317 64 BMI2
Now playing the same Ultimaiq's Stockfish 17032017 (bench=6128779), but with BMI2 support.
-
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm
Re: Komodo 10.4 C0 vs. SF 17032017 4CPU 600+10
Code: Select all
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 Stockfish 180317 64 : 44 53 52 72 56.2 % 0 56.9 %
2 Komodo 10.4 64-bit : 0 52 53 72 43.8 % 44 56.9 %
1 Stockfish 180317 64 : 44 72 (+ 20,= 41,- 11), 56.2 %
2 Komodo 10.4 64-bit : 0 72 (+ 11,= 41,- 20), 43.8 %