asmFish 240417 vs Komodo 10.4

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

beram
Posts: 1187
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:11 pm

asmFish 240417 vs Komodo 10.4

Post by beram »

On two systems i5 4200 2cpu and AMD Ryzen 8cpu I have played two matches of 100 games with own testbook of 25 lines

Result both matches won by asmFish with 61% +29 - 7 on the i5
and with 59,5% +27 -8 on the Ryzen1800 (drawpercentage 64 and 65%)
Especially with black asmFish 240417 is scoring much better, +12 -1 on the Ryzen and +18 -2 on the i5

Code: Select all

K10.4 - asmFish 240417 i5 4200 2x, Blitz 3m+2s                                    
1   asmFishW_2017-04-24_bmi2   +78  +29/=64/-7 61.00%   61.0/100
2   Komodo 10.4 64-bit         -78  +7/=64/-29 39.00%   39.0/100

K10.4 - asmFish240417 AMD Ryzen1800X 8x, Blitz 3m+2s               
1   asmFishW_2017-04-24_popcnt   +67  +27/=65/-8 59.50%   59.5/100
2   Komodo 10.4 64-bit           -67  +8/=65/-27 40.50%   40.5/100
Top
beram
Posts: 1187
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:11 pm

Re: asmFish 240417 vs Komodo 10.4

Post by beram »

With black asmFish played an outstanding model game
A typical black win which should really please the Kings Indian adepts
With a black pawn storm and a crushing knight sac in just 28 moves white is wiped away


[pgn]
[Event "K10.4 - AsmFish 240417, Blitz 3m+2s"]
[Site "I5-4200M @2500Mhz (Fritzmark4"]
[Date "2017.04.24"]
[Round "23"]
[White "Komodo 10.4 64-bit"]
[Black "asmFishW_2017-04-24_bmi2"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "E90"]
[Annotator "0.45;0.25"]
[PlyCount "56"]
[TimeControl "180+2"]

{Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4200M CPU @ 2.50GHz 2494 MHz W=20.5 plies; 2.194kN/s
B=21.5 plies; 2.995kN/s} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 d6 3. Nf3 g6 4. Nc3 Bg7 5. e4 O-O 6.
h3 e5 7. d5 {Both last book move} a5 {[%eval 25,24] [%emt 0:00:14]} 8. Bd3 {
[%eval 45,22] [%emt 0:00:08] (a3)} Nfd7 {[%eval 32,25] [%emt 0:00:09] (Nh5)} 9.
O-O {[%eval 44,23] [%emt 0:00:16] (a3)} f5 {[%eval 16,24] [%emt 0:00:08] (Na6)}
10. Bc2 {[%eval 36,23] [%emt 0:00:19] (a3)} f4 {[%eval 0,23] [%emt 0:00:05]
(Nc5)} 11. b3 {[%eval 20,22] [%emt 0:00:23]} Na6 {[%eval -13,25] [%emt 0:00:13]
(g5)} 12. a3 {[%eval 18,22] [%emt 0:00:08] (Bd3)} g5 {[%eval -29,21] [%emt 0:
00:04]} 13. Bd2 {[%eval 0,22] [%emt 0:00:14]} h5 {[%eval 0,24] [%emt 0:00:10]}
14. Nh2 {[%eval 0,22] [%emt 0:00:07] (Ne1)} Nf6 {[%eval -38,21] [%emt 0:00:03]}
15. f3 {[%eval -12,21] [%emt 0:00:18]} Qe8 {[%eval -66,21] [%emt 0:00:04] (Bd7)
} 16. Nb5 {[%eval -3,20] [%emt 0:00:05]} b6 {[%eval -81,21] [%emt 0:00:06]
(Qg6)} 17. b4 {[%eval 1,18] [%emt 0:00:03] (Bd3)} Qg6 {[%eval -105,19] [%emt 0:
00:03] (Bd7)} 18. Kh1 {[%eval -12,20] [%emt 0:00:10] (bxa5)} g4 {[%eval -154,
23] [%emt 0:00:22]} 19. Re1 {[%eval -14,20] [%emt 0:00:04] (bxa5)} g3 {[%eval
-139,24] [%emt 0:00:11] (axb4)} 20. Nf1 {[%eval 2,22] [%emt 0:00:04] (bxa5)}
Ng4 {[%eval -209,22] [%emt 0:00:03] (Bxh3)} 21. hxg4 {[%eval -55,20] [%emt 0:
00:05] (Re2)} hxg4 {[%eval -383,17] [%emt 0:00:03]} 22. Kg1 {[%eval -118,21]
[%emt 0:00:07]} Qh5 {[%eval -418,17] [%emt 0:00:01] (gxf3)} 23. Nc3 {[%eval
-288,18] [%emt 0:00:05] (Re3)} Rf6 {[%eval -638,20] [%emt 0:00:04] (axb4)} 24.
Ne2 {[%eval -462,19] [%emt 0:00:03] (Be3)} gxf3 {[%eval -751,21] [%emt 0:00:05]
} 25. gxf3 {[%eval -526,18] [%emt 0:00:02]} g2 {[%eval -810,20] [%emt 0:00:05]}
26. Nfg3 {[%eval -690,18] [%emt 0:00:08] (Kxg2)} Qh4 {[%eval -854,19] [%emt 0:
00:06]} 27. Rb1 {[%eval -732,20] [%emt 0:00:16] (c5)} fxg3 {[%eval -944,21]
[%emt 0:00:04]} 28. Nxg3 {[%eval -1041,19] [%emt 0:00:08]} Qxg3 {[%eval -953,
21] [%emt 0:00:01]} 0-1
[/pgn]
Top
jpqy
Posts: 550
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:31 am
Location: Belgium

Re: asmFish 240417 vs Komodo 10.4

Post by jpqy »

Hi Bram,

Thanks for your nice tournament :!:

I hope you know that BMI2 compiles has some problems on Ryzen cpu's at the moment..and you will get better results with a popcnt version..
Check here my last message with some benches : http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 4&start=60

Kind regards,
JP.
Top
beram
Posts: 1187
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:11 pm

Re: asmFish 240417 vs Komodo 10.4

Post by beram »

jpqy wrote:Hi Bram,

Thanks for your nice tournament :!:

I hope you know that BMI2 compiles has some problems on Ryzen cpu's at the moment..and you will get better results with a popcnt version..
Check here my last message with some benches : http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 4&start=60

Kind regards,
JP.
Thx Jean Paul,

I was aware of that and i am using popct version of asmFish

Grts Bram
Top
S.Taylor
Posts: 8514
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: asmFish 240417 vs Komodo 10.4

Post by S.Taylor »

beram wrote:With black asmFish played an outstanding model game
A typical black win which should really please the Kings Indian adepts
With a black pawn storm and a crushing knight sac in just 28 moves white is wiped away


[pgn]
[Event "K10.4 - AsmFish 240417, Blitz 3m+2s"]
[Site "I5-4200M @2500Mhz (Fritzmark4"]
[Date "2017.04.24"]
[Round "23"]
[White "Komodo 10.4 64-bit"]
[Black "asmFishW_2017-04-24_bmi2"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "E90"]
[Annotator "0.45;0.25"]
[PlyCount "56"]
[TimeControl "180+2"]

{Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4200M CPU @ 2.50GHz 2494 MHz W=20.5 plies; 2.194kN/s
B=21.5 plies; 2.995kN/s} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 d6 3. Nf3 g6 4. Nc3 Bg7 5. e4 O-O 6.
h3 e5 7. d5 {Both last book move} a5 {[%eval 25,24] [%emt 0:00:14]} 8. Bd3 {
[%eval 45,22] [%emt 0:00:08] (a3)} Nfd7 {[%eval 32,25] [%emt 0:00:09] (Nh5)} 9.
O-O {[%eval 44,23] [%emt 0:00:16] (a3)} f5 {[%eval 16,24] [%emt 0:00:08] (Na6)}
10. Bc2 {[%eval 36,23] [%emt 0:00:19] (a3)} f4 {[%eval 0,23] [%emt 0:00:05]
(Nc5)} 11. b3 {[%eval 20,22] [%emt 0:00:23]} Na6 {[%eval -13,25] [%emt 0:00:13]
(g5)} 12. a3 {[%eval 18,22] [%emt 0:00:08] (Bd3)} g5 {[%eval -29,21] [%emt 0:
00:04]} 13. Bd2 {[%eval 0,22] [%emt 0:00:14]} h5 {[%eval 0,24] [%emt 0:00:10]}
14. Nh2 {[%eval 0,22] [%emt 0:00:07] (Ne1)} Nf6 {[%eval -38,21] [%emt 0:00:03]}
15. f3 {[%eval -12,21] [%emt 0:00:18]} Qe8 {[%eval -66,21] [%emt 0:00:04] (Bd7)
} 16. Nb5 {[%eval -3,20] [%emt 0:00:05]} b6 {[%eval -81,21] [%emt 0:00:06]
(Qg6)} 17. b4 {[%eval 1,18] [%emt 0:00:03] (Bd3)} Qg6 {[%eval -105,19] [%emt 0:
00:03] (Bd7)} 18. Kh1 {[%eval -12,20] [%emt 0:00:10] (bxa5)} g4 {[%eval -154,
23] [%emt 0:00:22]} 19. Re1 {[%eval -14,20] [%emt 0:00:04] (bxa5)} g3 {[%eval
-139,24] [%emt 0:00:11] (axb4)} 20. Nf1 {[%eval 2,22] [%emt 0:00:04] (bxa5)}
Ng4 {[%eval -209,22] [%emt 0:00:03] (Bxh3)} 21. hxg4 {[%eval -55,20] [%emt 0:
00:05] (Re2)} hxg4 {[%eval -383,17] [%emt 0:00:03]} 22. Kg1 {[%eval -118,21]
[%emt 0:00:07]} Qh5 {[%eval -418,17] [%emt 0:00:01] (gxf3)} 23. Nc3 {[%eval
-288,18] [%emt 0:00:05] (Re3)} Rf6 {[%eval -638,20] [%emt 0:00:04] (axb4)} 24.
Ne2 {[%eval -462,19] [%emt 0:00:03] (Be3)} gxf3 {[%eval -751,21] [%emt 0:00:05]
} 25. gxf3 {[%eval -526,18] [%emt 0:00:02]} g2 {[%eval -810,20] [%emt 0:00:05]}
26. Nfg3 {[%eval -690,18] [%emt 0:00:08] (Kxg2)} Qh4 {[%eval -854,19] [%emt 0:
00:06]} 27. Rb1 {[%eval -732,20] [%emt 0:00:16] (c5)} fxg3 {[%eval -944,21]
[%emt 0:00:04]} 28. Nxg3 {[%eval -1041,19] [%emt 0:00:08]} Qxg3 {[%eval -953,
21] [%emt 0:00:01]} 0-1
[/pgn]
Cute game!
Maybe a stunning flagship game. But some top human players could have played the Knight sacrifice too.
Top
CheckersGuy
Posts: 273
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2016 9:49 pm

Re: asmFish 240417 vs Komodo 10.4

Post by CheckersGuy »

Is there any chance that asmfish will be in the next season of TCEC ?
Top
beram
Posts: 1187
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:11 pm

Re: asmFish 240417 vs Komodo 10.4

Post by beram »

beram wrote:On two systems i5 4200 2cpu and AMD Ryzen 8cpu I have played two matches of 100 games with own testbook of 25 lines

Result both matches won by asmFish with 61% +29 - 7 on the i5
and with 59,5% +27 -8 on the Ryzen1800 (drawpercentage 64 and 65%)
Especially with black asmFish 240417 is scoring much better, +12 -1 on the Ryzen and +18 -2 on the i5

Code: Select all

K10.4 - asmFish 240417 i5 4200 2x, Blitz 3m+2s                                    
1   asmFishW_2017-04-24_bmi2   +78  +29/=64/-7 61.00%   61.0/100
2   Komodo 10.4 64-bit         -78  +7/=64/-29 39.00%   39.0/100

K10.4 - asmFish240417 AMD Ryzen1800X 8x, Blitz 3m+2s               
1   asmFishW_2017-04-24_popcnt   +67  +27/=65/-8 59.50%   59.5/100
2   Komodo 10.4 64-bit           -67  +8/=65/-27 40.50%   40.5/100
I have replayed match on the Ryzen at TC 15m10s
Outcome much better now for Komodo 10.4
asmFish wins by +15 -9 =76 so 'just' a 53% win for asmFish

Code: Select all

AsmFish240417-K104 AMD Ryzen1800X 8x, TC 15m10s
                                      
1   asmFishW_2017-04-24_popcnt   +21  +15/=76/-9 53.00%   53.0/100
2   Komodo 10.4 64-bit           -21  +9/=76/-15 47.00%   47.0/100
Top

Return to “Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches”