I don't understand Andersen games.Henk wrote:I've a book in my house which I bought many years ago about Capablanca and it's chess games and I didn't like it that much. But it's only my opinion. I think games of Anderson, Steinitz and Nimzowich are more interesting. Not a fan of Kasparov.
Maybe I'll find games of Tartakower interesting too. But didn't take time to find out.
on the other hand, Capablanca games make perfect sense, although at times he seems to play rather weak.
btw., looking at the phenomenal Capablanca-Alekhine match, what a low quality of games, compared to, say, Karpov-Kasparov.
engines say, in Karpov-Kasparov match, most of the moves are blunders...