Funny that Komodo has now +3 -0 =8 out of the last 11 games.
It starts mirroring the first quarter result...
Funny how immediately after you comment suggesting Komodo's comeback it loses a game or two or even three in a short period .
Houdini is statistically better engine and actual chances for Komodo to win even if match lasted 200 games are pretty grim.
Funny that Komodo has now +3 -0 =8 out of the last 11 games.
It starts mirroring the first quarter result...
Funny how immediately after you comment suggesting Komodo's comeback it loses a game or two or even three in a short period :D.
Houdini is statistically better engine and actual chances for Komodo to win even if match lasted 200 games are pretty grim.
Still in your usual mood? Those 'manners' get a bit boring over time,
especially your childish abuse of smilies, which statistically increased
a lot over the last months.
There is no statistical evidence that Houdini or Komodo is better.
No one so far produced a significant amount of games that would proof one of them being better.
Guenther wrote:Still in your usual mood? Those 'manners' get a bit boring over time,
especially your childish abuse of smilies, which statistically increased
a lot over the last months.
There is no statistical evidence that Houdini or Komodo is better.
No one so far produced a significant amount of games that would proof one of them being better.
Always same bla, bla, no substance. It's clear you are approaching argument like a fan and not from a rational point of view. So I'll leave you to cheer.
Guenther wrote:
There is no statistical evidence that Houdini or Komodo is better.
No one so far produced a significant amount of games that would proof one of them being better.
You don't need a large # of games if the margin of victory is big enough...
Guenther wrote:
There is no statistical evidence that Houdini or Komodo is better.
No one so far produced a significant amount of games that would proof one of them being better.
You don't need a large # of games if the margin of victory is big enough...
Guenther wrote:
There is no statistical evidence that Houdini or Komodo is better.
No one so far produced a significant amount of games that would proof one of them being better.
You don't need a large # of games if the margin of victory is big enough...
There is no statistical evidence that Houdini or Komodo is better.
No one so far produced a significant amount of games that would proof one of them being better.
[/quote]
You are right.
But the one question is "What is the better engine?" and the other question is
"What engine may be the winner of TCEC?"
To give the right answer to the question one we would get lot of thousand games.
To give the right answer to the second question we have enough games yet.
In my opinion there is a small difference between Houidini and Kimodo in Elo number but the advantage is in the side of Houdini.
Congratulations Robert on winning the TCEC Season 10.
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers