Snowy UCI - Tordenskiold Java UCI

[Norbert Raimund Leisner]

Hello ,

cf. https://github.com/JasonCreighton/snowy by Jason Creighton

https://github.com/AoschkA/Tordenskiold by Jonas Praem

https://github.com/AoschkA/Tordenskiold ... skiold.jar

cf. Source Code Only List > Chess Royale by the same author

Best wishes,
Norbert

[Norbert Raimund Leisner]

Lucas Monge´s compile for Windows 64-bit of Snowy is here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tZTAlD ... ljN-4/view

Norbert

[Guenther]

Lucas Monge´s compile for Windows 64-bit of Snowy is here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tZTAlD ... ljN-4/view

Norbert

From what revision is the compile? There is no source and readme in the download.
The last revision tried to fix severe threading bugs just 7 hours ago.

Guenther

[Norbert Raimund Leisner]

The parameters that are used by Lucas:
Done using last sources.
"" segoe="" ui'";="" font-size:="" 14px;="" color:="" rgb(0,="" 0,="" 0);="" background-color:="" rgba(0,="" font-weight:="" normal;="" font-style:="" normal;text-decoration:="" none;'=""

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1m6b5dp ... Zr8Zy/view

GitHub said:

Thanks for writing in! We don't give out users' contact information if they have chosen not to provide it publicly. If it is public, you'll be able to see it by visiting their GitHub profile page. Their email address will be on the bottom left of their profile, below their picture. You can also create an issue on one of the user's repositories or leave a comment on some of their work asking them to contact you.

"This page is taking way too long to load.

Sorry about that. Please try refreshing and contact us if the problem persists."

The JasonCreighton/snowy doesn't have an issue tracker enabled, which might explain what you were seeing. Were you clicking the "Issues" button in the black header bar across the top?

Out of respect for the privacy of our users, we here at GitHub Support are unable to contact a user on your behalf.

In cases where a user doesn't have public contact information available (or where it's malfunctioning), we recommend opening an issue in the repository you have a question about -- that is often the quickest way contact a project maintainer.

Norbert

[Guenther]

The parameters that are used by Lucas:
Done using last sources.

That's not helpful. He (Lucas) should add at least add the revision number.
No one knows now if it was rev 20 or 21, or whatever when the real source
already was updated again twice yesterday...

[Norbert Raimund Leisner]

Perhaps this will be a way to inform Jason about the Snowy revision problem:

https://github.com/JasonCreighton/snowy ... e52b0f6097

Norbert

[Guenther]

Perhaps this will be a way to inform Jason about the Snowy revision problem:

https://github.com/JasonCreighton/snowy ... e52b0f6097

Norbert

Well, it is not a problem of the author of Snowy, just ask Lucas what revision he used... please don't spoil github accounts with useless messages.

It seems you didn't understand my post? How should the Snowy author know what Lucas Monge did and when??

[Norbert Raimund Leisner]

Lucas said: v0.1

In relation with the win64 compilation of snowy: https://github.com/JasonCreighton/snowy/releases

Norbert

[Guenther]

Lucas said: v0.1

In relation with the win64 compilation of snowy: https://github.com/JasonCreighton/snowy/releases

Norbert

This is wrong. 0.1 was introduced later. There were several commits already after the last LM compile before version was changed to 0.1 by the author. (one of them not simply renaming of variables)
I really don't understand why it is so hard to answer for Lucas and why he did not just add a rev number to his downloads, if he doesn't include the original sources?

Moreover we don't know if the exe on googledrive was just replaced by a newer one, because after downloading the download time will be added as timestamp, unlike if it would be available as zip.

We are as far as we were before - I give up asking and simply add a timestamp now...w/o knowing the exact revision/commit.