Not 100% sure, but I think you are right.Laskos wrote:
Thanks! Very strong computer, and LC0 benefits from that, I cannot achieve such high results. TC seems to be 1+1, right?
LCZero: Progress and Scaling. Relation to CCRL Elo
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 6340
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:34 pm
- Location: Acworth, GA
Re: LCZero: Progress and Scaling. Relation to CCRL Elo
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers
__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers
-
- Posts: 6340
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:34 pm
- Location: Acworth, GA
Re: LCZero: Progress and Scaling. Relation to CCRL Elo
Stop saying things like this, I am trying very hard over here not to upgrade my GPU! You have no idea how tempted I am to spend money on this right now. I'm like a drug addict going through withdrawals.Laskos wrote:Wow, on a good GPU and longer time control, LC0 rocks. It scales completely differently from standard engines, give it strong hardware and LTC, and it soares.Werewolf wrote:Very early days, but current result for LCZero 127 on NVidia 1060 vs Colossus 2008b @ 15 sec / move below. Colossus is single Intel Broadwell core @ 4.2 GHz.
4 wins
2 losses
1 draw
for LCZero
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers
__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers
-
- Posts: 10948
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:21 pm
- Full name: Kai Laskos
Re: LCZero: Progress and Scaling. Relation to CCRL Elo
AdminX wrote:Stop saying things like this, I am trying very hard over here not to upgrade my GPU! You have no idea how tempted I am to spend money on this right now. I'm like a drug addict going through withdrawals.Laskos wrote:Wow, on a good GPU and longer time control, LC0 rocks. It scales completely differently from standard engines, give it strong hardware and LTC, and it soares.Werewolf wrote:Very early days, but current result for LCZero 127 on NVidia 1060 vs Colossus 2008b @ 15 sec / move below. Colossus is single Intel Broadwell core @ 4.2 GHz.
4 wins
2 losses
1 draw
for LCZero
Pretty same here, need at least an Nvidia 1060, but maybe even higher. Bad times .
-
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:36 am
Re: LCZero: Progress and Scaling. Relation to CCRL Elo
Hold out for the next gen cards.
Either will get better perf/watt & absolute performance, or will very likely be able to buy previous gen cards for cheap as they become 2nd tier for mining.
Either will get better perf/watt & absolute performance, or will very likely be able to buy previous gen cards for cheap as they become 2nd tier for mining.
-
- Posts: 1796
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:24 pm
Re: LCZero: Progress and Scaling. Relation to CCRL Elo
Latest score for LCZero vs Colossus 2008b @15sec/moveLaskos wrote:AdminX wrote:Stop saying things like this, I am trying very hard over here not to upgrade my GPU! You have no idea how tempted I am to spend money on this right now. I'm like a drug addict going through withdrawals.Laskos wrote:Wow, on a good GPU and longer time control, LC0 rocks. It scales completely differently from standard engines, give it strong hardware and LTC, and it soares.Werewolf wrote:Very early days, but current result for LCZero 127 on NVidia 1060 vs Colossus 2008b @ 15 sec / move below. Colossus is single Intel Broadwell core @ 4.2 GHz.
4 wins
2 losses
1 draw
for LCZero
Pretty same here, need at least an Nvidia 1060, but maybe even higher. Bad times .
9 wins
6 losses
3 draws
Imagine what it would be at 1 min per move...
-
- Posts: 1796
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:24 pm
Re: LCZero: Progress and Scaling. Relation to CCRL Elo
haha.AdminX wrote:Stop saying things like this, I am trying very hard over here not to upgrade my GPU! You have no idea how tempted I am to spend money on this right now. I'm like a drug addict going through withdrawals.Laskos wrote:Wow, on a good GPU and longer time control, LC0 rocks. It scales completely differently from standard engines, give it strong hardware and LTC, and it soares.Werewolf wrote:Very early days, but current result for LCZero 127 on NVidia 1060 vs Colossus 2008b @ 15 sec / move below. Colossus is single Intel Broadwell core @ 4.2 GHz.
4 wins
2 losses
1 draw
for LCZero
You know I was thinking about the Titan V (not that I can afford it).
Someone said what holds the Nvidia cards back with LCZero is not the number of cores, but the memory. I don't know if that's true.
If it is true the Titan V is interesting because it uses faster memory than the rest of the Nvidia cards.
Also future Nvidia Volta cards will use GDDR6 which is slower than the Titan V's HBM2.
$3000 ouch...
-
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2017 4:06 pm
- Location: Argentina
Re: LCZero: Progress and Scaling. Relation to CCRL Elo
If any1's interested, I'm doing a 100-game match between Leela and Scorpio, 30 min + 10 sec TC, ponder on (for scorpio), no TBs. Opening book is TCEC Season 10 Superfinal.
It might end 100-0, but it's just for fun.
Broadcasting live at my twitch channel, link in my signature.
It might end 100-0, but it's just for fun.
Broadcasting live at my twitch channel, link in my signature.
Follow my tournament and some Leela gauntlets live at http://twitch.tv/ccls
-
- Posts: 2283
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 2:13 am
Re: LCZero: Progress and Scaling. Relation to CCRL Elo
Why not use Scorpio-MCTS? It would be a much closer match.CMCanavessi wrote:If any1's interested, I'm doing a 100-game match between Leela and Scorpio, 30 min + 10 sec TC, ponder on (for scorpio), no TBs. Opening book is TCEC Season 10 Superfinal.
It might end 100-0, but it's just for fun.
Broadcasting live at my twitch channel, link in my signature.
Cheers,
CL
-
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:19 pm
Re: LCZero: Progress and Scaling. Relation to CCRL Elo
Good idea.CMCanavessi wrote:If any1's interested, I'm doing a 100-game match between Leela and Scorpio, 30 min + 10 sec TC, ponder on (for scorpio), no TBs. Opening book is TCEC Season 10 Superfinal.
It might end 100-0, but it's just for fun.
Broadcasting live at my twitch channel, link in my signature.
Also it's not Scorpios fault that Zero still can't use ponder on.
But time control should be at least 30-60 seconds per move, then Zero will win easily the match, and maybe 60 min.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 11:37 am
Re: LCZero: Progress and Scaling. Relation to CCRL Elo
On my XEON 2670 with GTX 1070Ti, LC0 wins the match using the 20 opening positions from John Nunn against stockfish9 strength 15 (1 core for stockfish9).
23-17 (19-13-8; +56)
LC0 is very strong with a fast GPU.
23-17 (19-13-8; +56)
LC0 is very strong with a fast GPU.