TalkChess.com

corres wrote: ↑

Thu Jul 09, 2020 11:38 am

It would be good if developer of Leela would let out the source of Leela without bugs.

This would be good for all software, everywhere.

lkaufman wrote: ↑

Tue Jul 07, 2020 6:26 am

Komodo rules!

Can we expect a net trained with Komodo 14 evals and pv? I’d do it myself, but all of my compute resources are busy training Bad Gyal 9.

Scipion wrote: ↑

Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:13 pm

Hello. Any chance you release an UCI version of engine ? The exe on github doesnt charge on Fritz gui.

Aside from the NNUE, it’s stockfish, so it is an UCI engine.

Just to throw some more fuel on the fire, the GPU server was rebooted after 26 games because admins thought there might be something amiss. Before reboot, SF +4. After reboot: SF +1. Who knows. Before reboot, SF +4. After reboot: SF +4. Fanboys of NN usually don't know. :lol: Times passes, scores c...

Just to throw some more fuel on the fire, the GPU server was rebooted after 26 games because admins thought there might be something amiss. Before reboot, SF +4. After reboot: SF +1. Who knows.

Thanks! I guess MLH shouldn't change Elo, if Leela was trolling in the endgames without actually missing conversion? But does MLH change the goal from scoring optimization to something like scoring + moves left optimization? That would change Elo. It’s an extra head, so a little bit of a slowdown. ...

I suspect you don’t have MLH turned on. Here are some params: !mlh mlh1 mlh2 mlh3 mlh4 MovesLeftMaxEffect 0.15 0.2179 0.2 0.2 0.15 MovesLeftThreshold 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 MovesLeftSlope 0.01 0.0346 0.007 0.007 0.015 MovesLeftQuadraticFactor 0.85 1.0 0.85 0.0 1.0 MovesLeftScaledFactor 0.0 0.0 0.15 1.0...

Which version of lc0 and which mlh settings are you using? v0.25.1 cudnn-fp16 No MLH settings (moves left head, right?). They are not accessible via easy to use UCI settings and I don't know what values to put anyway. --show-hidden That’s the flag that makes mlh visible in uci. Don’t ask me why the...

Which version of lc0 and which mlh settings are you using?

I’m not so much in contact as more of a thorn in their side. There’s a lot of confirmation bias in the tests (most of which are STC). Regardless of what’s being tested, the nets are always magically 20-60 elo ahead of sfdev. Periodic tests of the pgn’s show there are quite often substantial duplicat...