Search found 4 matches
- Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:37 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Programming and Technical Discussions
- Topic: 7-men Syzygy attempt
- Replies: 588
- Views: 200491
Re: 7-men Syzygy attempt
A one-letter typo in the syzygy codebase: sizt_t util.c, line 303: static void decompress(struct CompressState *state, void *dst, sizt_t chunk, This branch must not be covered in the regression tests. The line is conditional compiled out by the makefile as distributed, i.e. -DUSE_ZSTD invokes the zs...
- Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:30 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Programming and Technical Discussions
- Topic: 7-men Syzygy attempt
- Replies: 588
- Views: 200491
Re: 7-men Syzygy attempt
On my end I believe I now have a complete and correct set. On your side as you (Sesse) noticed, you had an old version of KRRNvKRR.rtbz, the give-away being the file size discrepancy compared to the lichess ftp listing. The remaining five -- KNNPPvKR.rtbw, KQBNvKQN.rtbw, KQRPvKRB.rtbw, KRBBNvKQ.rtbz...
- Sat Sep 08, 2018 4:04 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Programming and Technical Discussions
- Topic: 7-men Syzygy attempt
- Replies: 588
- Views: 200491
Re: 7-men Syzygy attempt
I like sha256. It takes twice as long as md5 to generate and verify, though. Or, half the time of sha512, if you want to look at it that way.
- Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:41 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Programming and Technical Discussions
- Topic: 7-men Syzygy attempt
- Replies: 588
- Views: 200491
Re: 7-men Syzygy attempt
Attached is a set of md5sums files for the complete set. If anyone would care to cross-verify I'd appreciate it. Back in the day of Nalimov promulgation, circa 2005-2006, md5sum signatures were considered essential to ensuring transmission correctness. I believe this is still true even though the sy...