TalkChess.com

Hi !

After 300 games + 55 to version 12.50.

https://cegt.forumieren.com/t1371-testi ... -12-75-x64

Best wishes,
G.S.
(CEGT team)

AndrewGrant wrote: ↑

Mon Oct 12, 2020 7:06 am

Thanks! Quite the lengthy name though

Maybe better that way: "Ethereal 12.75 x64 (PK+RPK-NN)" ?

Best wishes,
G.S.
(CEGT team)

Hi,

300 games played, + 78 so far.

https://cegt.forumieren.com/t1370-testi ... -12-75-x64

Best wishes,
G.S.
(CEGT team)

Nice to finally see a big gain in a list for Slow 2.3, although I suspect luck played a large role in it. It does also seem to be the case that the changes helped more against stronger opponents. Thanks for testing. After 800 games still +37. https://cegt.forumieren.com/t1360-testing-slowchess-clas...

AndrewGrant wrote: ↑

Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:58 am

I'm disappointed that you are still testing Houdini. You essentially have 3x sets of games between Stockfish and Ethereal :/

3x sets?

Whom do you have in the suspicion too?

Best wishes,
G.S.
(CEGT team)

@ CEGT 40/4 (no FRC) so far:
Best wishes,
G.S.
(CEGT team)

Update, 600 games are played, + 19 so far.

https://cegt.forumieren.com/t1354-testi ... -12-50-x64

Best wishes,
G.S.
(CEGT team)

Note that I use a book called 8moves_v3 for Regression Testing. This book is typically very conservative. For the last few releases, (aside from some Contempt nonsense) I have under estimated the performance via this testing. This is likely due to the drawish nature of the opening book. I could be ...

Hi !

https://cegt.forumieren.com/t1354-testi ... -12-50-x64

Best wishes,
G.S.
(CEGT team)

Update, 450 games are played. Stockfish 12.0 x64 1CPU (NNUE) ELO 3631 SFNNUE 200715 (G200627) x64 ELO 3538 Stockfish 20200530 x64 1CPU ELO 3524 Stockfish 11.0 x64 1CPU ELO 3487 https://cegt.forumieren.com/t1351-testing-stockfish-12-0-x64-1cpu-nnue Best wishes, G.S. (CEGT team)