TalkChess.com

Max wrote: ↑

Fri Jul 19, 2019 11:44 am

Update with more networks like Bad Gyal, Little Demon, the 49xxx, jhorthos 320x24 and others.

Thanks for continuing to try and show!

maxdeg wrote: ↑

Mon Jul 15, 2019 9:01 am

dkappe wrote: ↑

Sun Jul 14, 2019 8:34 pm

Bad Gyal 4a

The endgame data was problematic. This is a rerun without that data at 128x10. This should be the strongest net tactically, including T40, LD2.

+1

+2

Hi Eelco Yes, but does not mean that CyberNezh has a wrong PV, if it recognizes somehow that Qh4 also does not cut it. White's clearly winning after 1.Nd4 Qh5 2.g4, with 2...Qh4 as well as with 2...Qxg4. 2...Qh4 3.Nf3 and 3...Qxg4 is refuted by 4.Rhg1. After some Forward- Backward of this line and 2...

r1b2rk1/pp3ppp/1n2p3/3pP3/2P2B2/b1PB1qP1/P1Q1NP1P/1K1R3R w - - 1. Nd4 with at least +2 or equivalent winning score. Great one! Here's komodo with max. King Safety and Dynamism, Minimum Selectivity and Reductions, White Contempt 50: 24 threads of 3x12GHz CPU, no tbs used. Engine: Komodo 13.02 64-bit...

r1b2rk1/pp3ppp/1n2p3/3pP3/2P2B2/b1PB1qP1/P1Q1NP1P/1K1R3R w - - 1. Nd4 with at least +2 or equivalent winning score. Great one! Most engines in 3MV- mode have Nd4 at third best from very start, yet none with default parameters found 2.g4 after 1...Qh5 within 15 minutes at my trials at 24 threads of ...

What happened here? Two things happened: Draw death of engine- chesss and black box- death of intelligibilty of engine- chess. Like Chrilly Donninger used to say, it's like watching the washer washing the laundry. SF et al already were rather unintelligible in their ways of playing, NNs are fully. ...

Maybe odds matches in Fischer Random is harder for the human side. Humans are used to the standard opening setup. The unfamiliarity of Chess960 may give the engine the upper hand? Of course, Jon. I still think the easiest to organize and finance was the corr.- thing with the bookless LC0- engine on...

There should be more computer with 2 pawns or Knight vs pawn odds that will bring back the challenge of Humans GMs vs top Engines. :shock: I believe that top GMs like Nakamura or MVL can bring back the excitement of Computer Vs Humans. I support your quest. I'd find it even more interesting in time...

AndrewGrant wrote: ↑

Sat Jun 29, 2019 12:00 pm

Its not about the root position, its about the positions that get explored.

Somewhere in Ethereal's search, the given position is reduced to a 5 man one, via a serious of (potentially awful) exchanges. This is when criteria #2 is met, and TB hits are occurring.

Now I got it, thanks again.

Thanks a lot for the new version, Andrew! So SyzygyProbeDepth applies to the highest cardinality for the Tablebases. IE, if you have a 6 man table base setup, If Ethereal probes, then one of the following is true: 1) The current depth is greater than or equal to SyzygyProbeDepth (Setting 127 makes t...