Search found 102 matches

by Taner Altinsoy
Sat Dec 14, 2013 12:08 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Did you miss Borislav Ivanov?
Replies: 87
Views: 13969

Re: Official statement

Did you miss the part where he claims he beats both Houdini and Rybka ... 10 out of 10 times ... 100% against an entity that is playing over 3200 ELO !!! That alone should be enough to convince you or anyone on this board that this guy is full of crap! That was obviously an emotional statement. Whe...
by Taner Altinsoy
Fri Dec 13, 2013 9:58 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Did you miss Borislav Ivanov?
Replies: 87
Views: 13969

Re: Official statement

Did you miss the part where he claims he beats both Houdini and Rybka ... 10 out of 10 times ... 100% against an entity that is playing over 3200 ELO !!! That alone should be enough to convince you or anyone on this board that this guy is full of crap! That was obviously an emotional statement. Whe...
by Taner Altinsoy
Mon Jul 15, 2013 6:04 am
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Borislav Ivanov: a Lilov's add-on
Replies: 336
Views: 55471

Re: Receiving moves // Re: Borislav Ivanov: a Lilov's add-on

Some legal aspects sre discussed here: http://www.chessbase.com/Home/TabId/211/PostId/4010353/irina-lymar-fide-must-develop-anti-cheating-rules-030713.aspx According to your link (from chessbase), Ivanov refused because it is in conflict with "7th Varna Open", really funny when a week prior to the ...
by Taner Altinsoy
Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:56 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Borislav Ivanov: a Lilov's add-on
Replies: 336
Views: 55471

Re: Borislav Ivanov: a Lilov's add-on

I wonder what kind of cheating detection tests they had in store for him for the planned meeting...
by Taner Altinsoy
Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:51 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: IM Andrew Martin analysis of Ivanov–Rombaldoni
Replies: 72
Views: 7468

Re: IM Andrew Martin analysis of Ivanov–Rombaldoni

The point is: You cannot base a serious accusation on a flawed, weak, proven incapable detection method. If an attempt to prove computer cheating gives results like Rubinstein was a computer cheater in 1914, then obviously, the method is void. You need to come up with something better, e.g. the sus...
by Taner Altinsoy
Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:43 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: IM Andrew Martin analysis of Ivanov–Rombaldoni
Replies: 72
Views: 7468

Re: IM Andrew Martin analysis of Ivanov–Rombaldoni

The point is: You cannot base a serious accusation on a flawed, weak, proven incapable detection method. If an attempt to prove computer cheating gives results like Rubinstein was a computer cheater in 1914, then obviously, the method is void. You need to come up with something better, e.g. the sus...
by Taner Altinsoy
Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:37 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: IM Andrew Martin analysis of Ivanov–Rombaldoni
Replies: 72
Views: 7468

Re: IM Andrew Martin analysis of Ivanov–Rombaldoni

As for Ivanov, from my perspective the point is: "In dubio contra reo" cannot be applied in the real world, like on a chess server. I also object against the idea that a player's current rating is included into the suspicion. Because that would mean, noone is ever allowed to play stronger than he i...
by Taner Altinsoy
Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:50 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: IM Andrew Martin analysis of Ivanov–Rombaldoni
Replies: 72
Views: 7468

Re: IM Andrew Martin analysis of Ivanov–Rombaldoni

But with that type of evidence I can prove easily, that Rubinstein was a computer cheater in the year 1914. :mrgreen: The problem is move matching is not evidence that could be used in court. For the simple reason that move matching a computer has itself not been shown to be proof of cheating. It w...