TalkChess.com

I think that one important thing for testing chess engines is the different time control for each side.

As far as I know only cutechess-cli and aquarium have this feature.

Is it so difficult to program this?

Lc0BoostSFdevMyOp 2019 Stockfish_19032014_x64_bmi2 2200 - Lc0Boost32930 2200 49.0 - 51.0 +12/=74/-14 49.00% Stockfish_19032014_x64_bmi2 2200 - Lc0_41871 2200 44.5 - 55.5 +9/=71/-20 44.50% Stockfish_19032014_x64_bmi2 2200 - Lc0Boost7000_32930 2200 51.0 - 49.0 +11/=80/-9 51.00% Level: Blitz 5/3 Hardwa...

From your results it seems that the 1000 steps nets are better than the 7000 steps. From my results at longer time control the differences decrease.. Engine Score St 1: Stockfish_10_x64 32,5/66 ······················ 2: Lc0v41997 12,5/22 ===10===01==1=11=0===1 3: Lc0Boost7000_41800 11,0/22 ==0=0=0=0...

dkappe wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 20, 2019 8:55 pm

About even with 41800, but plays more aggressively, less "trolly."

https://github.com/dkappe/leela-chess-w ... t-Networks

Thanks for share, I will test the new net.

Here are my two running tournaments. It seems that LC0Boost1000 steps scores better than 7000 steps. Both with Silver Suite 50x2 games in each match Engine Score St 1: Stockfish_19032014_x64 104/222 ·········································································· 2: Lc0Boost32930 41,5/74 ...

Here are my two running tournaments. It seems that LC0Boost1000 steps scores better than 7000 steps. Both with Silver Suite 50x2 games in each match Engine Score St 1: Stockfish_19032014_x64 104/222 ·········································································· 2: Lc0Boost32930 41,5/74 =...

After some additional testing, the boost net at 7000 steps is about the same head 2 head and vs sf10 at 1+1. The style of play is a bit different, however. Would appreciate feedback. https://github.com/dkappe/leela-chess-weights/wiki/Boost-Networks Thank you very much! I am going to test the new Bo...

In the two following examples, the Cerebellum book played a move evaluated as !? by Hiarcs14z book, winning in the first case and losing in the second. Here 11.Be3!? seems to work well. [Event "Lc0_41765BrainFish2019Silver"] [Site "J-PC"] [Date "2019.04.02"] [Round "73"] [White "BrainFish_190325_x64...

...and some examples where the Cerebellum book worked very well Lc0 started thinking at move 10 and BrainFish at move 26! with winning evaluation 26. Rhxh5 {2.15/33 28} [Event "Lc0_41765BrainFish2019Silver"] [Site "J-PC"] [Date "2019.03.31"] [Round "29"] [White "BrainFish_190325_x64_bmi2"] [Black "L...

Thanks for the new Leela-Cerebellum. I have tested the 2019 version of Cerebellum against Lc0 41765 on RTX2070 against BrainFish 2019 on i7 4790S 8 cores at 15 minutes plus 3 seconds ponder off, using the Silver Test positions. Lc0_41765BrainFish2019Silver 2019 1 Lc0_v0.21.1_41765 +20 +16/=74/-10 53...