TalkChess.com

leavenfish wrote: ↑

Mon May 21, 2018 1:43 am

Well, tried that, copied straight from your post...same problem.

https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/komodochess.com

yorkman wrote:Ok, I'm not going to argue. If this behaviour is OK for the SF team then it's not a problem. But now I know not to trust SF's eval now, even if it is showing it's up almost +7.00

YLCET SCAM!

Score of Stockfish 170912 BMI2 vs Komodo 11.2.2 C0: 130 - 112 - 758 [0.509] 1000
ELO difference: 6.25 +/- 10.58

https://www.dropbox.com/s/x9wsx59awnckk ... 2.zip?dl=0

Laser hype!

nitrocan wrote:Rabid tournament? Lol

Appropriate.

50m+10s tc

Score of Stockfish 170912 BMI2 vs Houdini 6.03 C0: 80 - 84 - 836 [0.498] 1000
ELO difference: -1.39 +/- 8.71

https://www.dropbox.com/s/lhnk9iguqaabi ... 6.zip?dl=0

Did the tournament stop/crash?

Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote:
Alpha hardware equivalent was somewhere 1024 standard cores.
How 1024 cores compare with 64 cores?
How scientific is that.

Has Jonny on 2000 cores ever beaten Komodo 28-0?

Jouni wrote:Sounds like april fool. But isn't !. I just read, that they are not interested in chess? But I read somewhere: So basically they played 400 cores engine vs 60 cores engine. Hmm..

Here come the excuses.

Hopefully at some point we'll get the feature set that TCEC needs in mainline cutechess. Currently they're using this fork (which has some pretty impressive features) which is 534 commits behind mainline and it's almost pointless to try to debug it: https://github.com/jeremybernstein/cutechess If t...