TalkChess.com

Perhaps you are unaware that the poster you replied to improved compression of chess DTZ databases by more than most people would have believed possible? He unaware this is are also the chess forums. The chess people know more better than the checkers. Then also... ... the indexers are the maddest ...

We can learn the deep believer how make better engine code yes? The trainer datas we copy from stockfish git commitments. Then in the fishtest you can know how much good is every git commitment. So we have the label. Then do the learn. Then the deep believer can write the new good patch also.

Now we change the 50 mover rule. It is outdated! We then also change the en passant. It is outdated! It is unfair only PAWN can use this one. But if my opponent plays the d7-d5, it should be fair enough every piece can now capture on the square of d6: also Bishop Night Castle and King can do. Agree?...

Uri Blass wrote:I do not think that

Uri Blass wrote:I think that

Uri Blass wrote:I do not think that

Uri Blass wrote:I think that

Uri Blass wrote:I do not believe that

Uri Blass wrote:I do not think that

Uri Blass wrote:I believe that

Uri Blass wrote:I think that

Uri Blass wrote:I do not believe that

Maybe you think too many things yes?

Jezus love you.

They find the 115 mater hundreds year ago. Then they already upgrade the rule you ask in 1928. Our granddaddies asked for it yes? Then it become a mess because the computers find more. Every time they change the ruler. But nobody can understand the database move. They change rule in 1992. Now it alw...

I guess the best solution would be this: a side that has a win can request a larger number of moves than 50 in order to achieve it. But if he does so, and doesn't manage to win (e.g. because the game converts to insufficient material, or runs into a repetition), he will be declared loser. That shou...

You want play different game but this game is not your thinking.

In this particular case: with the 50 move rule in play and under perfect play by both engines (guaranteed by the use of tablebases) the relevant position is a draw. There's simply no room for discussion. I say "yes". The same they deny the climate change also deny 50 mover and voted the Zaphod Beeb...

They gave the SYZYGY to the engine. The SYZYGY follow the FIDE ruler. But they gave the GAVIOTA to the GUI. The GAVIOTA don't follow the FIDE ruler. The GAVIOTA has the wrong data. It is the bug. They must give the same to engine and to GUI. They say they follow FIDE 50 move rule. They must give SY...

They gave the SYZYGY to the engine. The SYZYGY follow the FIDE ruler. But they gave the GAVIOTA to the GUI. The GAVIOTA don't follow the FIDE ruler. The GAVIOTA has the wrong data. It is the bug. They must give the same to engine and to GUI. They say they follow FIDE 50 move rule. They must give SYZ...