TalkChess.com

Happy new year from Italy! land of history, poetry and ... chess!

Meanwhile, Houdini is winning with black ...

20 games to say it is superior, sorry but it's ridiculous!

New Release: Guys, I have just released few minutes ago, the new versions of my opening books (Abk and Ctg), you can use them to check the openings which will be played during this tournament, in engine vs engine matches, in correspondence chess, and in preparing your repertoire for a human tournam...

no comments about the games posted? Are realistic data, there is something abnormal, other ....?!
I would like to know your opinion.
Ciao

5960x - 8 cores for engine Hash: 512 Mb time: 5'+0" no book Tbase: yes https://s26.postimg.org/ohg0wnxkp/Immagine2.png If you care about the quality of the games, an increment is mandatory. Instead of playing 5+0 games, why not 5+1 sec or 4+1sec? Yeap, without time increment these test doesn't mean...

What usefull information did you get from that test then ? despite the provocative tone of your question, I can assert that I, based on the 300 game tests that I did on my PC with 8 core for engine, 512 Mh hash and no book, on time 3+0 and 5 +0, SF dev was higher respectively about 22 and 24 elo be...

JJJ wrote:Yeap, without time increment these test doesn't mean anything.

Sorry but I do not agree with this statement, every test has its usefulness!
I say this as a Houdini supporter since version 2 and this Robert Houdart I believe that know it!

There are 10 time losses for Houdini in the match. Which defeats the whole point of playing the match... Playing long engine games without time increment is futile, beyond move 100 it becomes a matter of which engine has the default Move Overhead value that works best for the GUI that plays the mat...

5960x - 8 cores for engine
Hash: 512 Mb
time: 5'+0"
no book
Tbase: yes




http://www58.zippyshare.com/v/6IgYEyYa/file.html