TalkChess.com

Minic is finally getting >1000 at STS @10sec per position (single core, on quite old hardware) : 1051 still not very smart but that's better.

Ok I get your point but i'd be curious to see some stats on the subject (match lenght, tpye of draws...). Sudden-death matches can also suffer from blunder in end game or failure to find a mate sequence being too short on time and living on a small increment... I guess I shall work on sudden death +...

Is there some interest in faster testing (ultra-bullet style)? something that would be like a CCRL 40/1 scale (meaning 4 times faster than CCRL 40/4, so around 20sec or 15sec on recent hardware). It would be quite cheap testing and a database can be built pretty quickly. This is already pretty good...

Is there some interest in faster testing (ultra-bullet style)? something that would be like a CCRL 40/1 scale (meaning 4 times faster than CCRL 40/4, so around 20sec or 15sec on recent hardware). It would be quite cheap testing and a database can be built pretty quickly. This is already pretty good...

Is there some interest in faster testing (ultra-bullet style)? something that would be like a CCRL 40/1 scale (meaning 4 times faster than CCRL 40/4, so around 20sec or 15sec on recent hardware).

It would be quite cheap testing and a database can be built pretty quickly.

Some Windows results, same TC and hash, native VS build Rank Name Elo +/- Games Score Draws 0 Minic 18 14 1775 52.6% 27.9% 1 Winter_0.6_New_Windows 99 28 443 63.9% 27.5% 2 Topple_0.7.1 -2 27 444 49.8% 32.0% 3 rofChade 1 -28 28 444 45.9% 26.6% 4 fruit_21 -146 29 444 30.2% 25.7% 1775 of 4000 games fin...

some recent progress @TC 40/1min 1024M hash (around CCRL40/4), here Minic dev version head to head with various engines :) 1 Winter 167 54 143 72.4% 23.1% 2 zurichess-neuchatel 61 50 143 58.7% 26.6% 3 Topple 42 45 142 56.0% 40.1% 4 ruy-1.1.9 -5 48 143 49.3% 28.7% 5 asymptote_v0.6 -7 48 144 49.0% 28....

Another related question would be, what it you're best error on quiet-labeled from zurichess ?

Minic best is 0.0574 (with K=1.47037), but I read somewhere that Zurichess itself goes down to 0.056.

fabianVDW wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 12, 2019 6:40 pm

Tried now with 20% of CCRL data (around 7mil positions):

k: 0.6089, Error: 0.09379 Residual: 0.30625 STC Tests: Cancelled early +38 =46 -106 -130.1 +/-52.7 Elo

Data seems to be too badly labelled.

ok thanks for testing, these are only >2800 elo games. The result shall be quite reliable.

File is available here for some time : https://serv.x-ray.fr/chess/CCRL-quiet-labeled.edp.tar.gz (my home server) Here is also a python script to randomly split it, because it is maybe to huge to be used ... import random import sys def split_huge_file(file,out1,out2,percentage=0.75,seed=42): rando...