Search found 293 matches

by RubiChess
Wed Apr 14, 2021 6:57 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: New engine releases & news 2021
Replies: 236
Views: 48478

Re: New engine releases & news 2021

Summer is near and my garden needs some work to do the next weeks so I released RubiChess 2.1.

https://github.com/Matthies/RubiChess/releases/tag/2.1

New stronger net and some other improvements.

Have fun.
Regards, Andreas
by RubiChess
Sat Apr 10, 2021 5:11 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Which version of Ethereal should I use for inter i7 ?
Replies: 11
Views: 695

Re: Which version of Ethereal should I use for inter i7 ?

Chessqueen wrote:
Sat Apr 10, 2021 4:20 pm
Do not worry Rubichess will be tested next against Igel using my intel i7 4770 3.40 GHz TC 2'+1" . Do you have any latest Beta version that I can test Vs Igel ?
I have but I only give it to people who know how to use an engine.
by RubiChess
Sat Apr 10, 2021 6:57 am
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: We are past the stage where the OS has become the virus
Replies: 91
Views: 2516

Re: We are past the stage where the OS has become the virus

We have our chess engines that make us buy new hardware every several years. But the normal users need some help from the software companies to detect that the hardware is too old and needs to be replaced 8-) About the CompatTelRunner process: Seems to be triggered by a scheduled task (Microsoft/Win...
by RubiChess
Sat Apr 10, 2021 6:14 am
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Which version of Ethereal should I use for inter i7 ?
Replies: 11
Views: 695

Re: Which version of Ethereal should I use for inter i7 ?

I don't know why I'm answering the Chesstroll again because it won't change anything but...
You probably did something wrong in your tests... again.
My guess is that you haven't set any value for the Hashtable size in your test.
Ethereal has default 16MB, Igel has default Hash 128MB.
by RubiChess
Thu Mar 25, 2021 12:22 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches
Topic: CCRL Testing (@Testers)
Replies: 38
Views: 2846

Re: CCRL Testing (@Testers)

Both engines handle the 10s time control easily and i did not see any time losses. But maybe one engines uses 9.9 seconds in very few moves and than running on increment not losing on time but barely leaving the "pruning at shallow depth" area (if you really used 10ms increment) which will result i...
by RubiChess
Thu Mar 25, 2021 11:13 am
Forum: Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches
Topic: CCRL Testing (@Testers)
Replies: 38
Views: 2846

Re: CCRL Testing (@Testers)

You write "Setup: 10s+10ms Hash 16MB (cutechess-cli) (1xThread both)" for your test. This is totally different from the time controls used at CCRL which uses time-per-40moves and far longer times than your 10+0.01 even in blitz. Btw. Do you really use 10ms (=+0.01) increment?? I wouldn't be surprise...
by RubiChess
Thu Mar 25, 2021 10:50 am
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Stash has lost 2 game because of NO EGTB
Replies: 13
Views: 1292

Re: Stash has lost 2 game because of NO EGTB

+10 Now the Troll can return to the TCEC chat , wich is full of I----S 😁 Chessqueen troll is active in TCEC chat?? Which account? Don't know lol Was just a joke 😁 Well, CQ has linked the TCEC URL here for ~1000 times and he obviously likes to talk so it wouldn't be a big surprise to see him in TCEC...
by RubiChess
Thu Mar 25, 2021 9:43 am
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Cutechess - errors
Replies: 26
Views: 2432

Re: Cutechess - errors

Krzysztof Grzelak wrote:
Thu Mar 25, 2021 7:22 am
I expect the program, as well as many other people, without errors. If there are bugs, the program should never be released for use by other people. And there's no pity and sorry.
You have a very bad day, don't you?
If your expectations come true, the world will be free from any software.
by RubiChess
Thu Mar 25, 2021 9:37 am
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: ncm testing at its best
Replies: 3
Views: 460

Re: ncm testing at its best

People in SF discord discovered that the details of this last NCM test shows some horrible NPS variances/decrease in some workers. So there was probably some load on the machines that influenced the test.

Regards, Andreas