TalkChess.com

I have only one Pigeon exe, the popcnt one.

Here is the first part: /O_ Pigeon Chess Engine 1.5.1 || UCI/SSE4/POPCNT / \\ =/__// pigeonengine.com ^^ uci id name Pigeon 1.5.1 id author Stuart Riffle option name Hash type spin min 64 max 16384 default 512 option name OwnBook type check default true uciok ucinewgame isready readyok setoption nam...

Hi Günther, I'm not sure I have understood what you had written but here is my output (and input as well): /O_ Pigeon Chess Engine 1.5.1 || UCI/SSE4/POPCNT / \\ =/__// pigeonengine.com ^^ uci id name Pigeon 1.5.1 id author Stuart Riffle option name Hash type spin min 64 max 16384 default 512 option ...

That's it! Addiction is spreading! Thank you Colin. Next one to test for me.

Thanks, I'm looking forward to trying it.

Yes I have removed the uci protocol because it isn't completely implemented (analyse mode, step back, step forward). If you need it for some tournaments I will add it again, it is just a conditional compilation. If an engine knows both protocols I have more freedom in arranging my tournaments. I us...

hgm wrote: ↑

Mon Feb 15, 2021 10:01 am

Now I moved the whole lot back to this thread, only leaving out the postings that engaged in, or referred to the name calling.

Again, my sincerest apologies for this.[/color]

Thanks HG. I myself have lost two posts but didn't deem them important enough to complain about.

As far as I can see, the debate here is about how much the evaluation (the net) of FF2 differs from that of SF. Can it be measured? Can you say that Shashchess's/SugaR's evaluation is so much different from SF evaluation that they deserve an own family? While FF2's evaluation is so close to that of ...

Hi Christophe,

Have you removed UCI support?

twobeer wrote: ↑

Sun Feb 14, 2021 5:01 am

Or another way to put it..

Why is
Crystal,
CFish
Fisherov
RaubFish
Eman
Sugar AI
Corchess

etc.. exluded on the list..

Speaking for myself, I am not interested in them. I think that public interest is also quite limited.