TalkChess.com

gladius wrote: ↑

Sun Feb 14, 2021 12:00 am

it is a bad choice to include Fat Fritz 2 on the list

I don't think so. It is of great public interest, therefore its inclusion is justified, IMO.

WIthout proper info on actual network versions used it all becomes a trust, mumbo-jumo issue.. Even for Pohls rating-list. In a very short match (20 games) with 30s+0.2s I obtained this result: Score of Fat_Fritz_2-x64 (commercial) vs Fat_Fritz_2-x64 (github net): 6 - 0 - 14 [0.650] Elo difference:...

pohl4711 wrote: ↑

Sat Feb 13, 2021 10:45 am

I looked into both nets with a HEX-editor and they are definitly different!

How did you do that? The official release has no separate net, it's embedded.

Ceibo 0.6

https://sites.google.com/site/ceibochess/home

Hi Thomas,

It is very likely that I will start a tournament with it in the coming days.

PS. Where are you from?

I set mt=1 in the ini file but Scorpio still uses 2 cores of my 4-core engine. What shall I do? Hi Gabor, What mode are you running ? It should obey mt parameter for NNUE/HCE but the meaning of the mt parameter is different for NNs. Please don't change the mt parameter in that case. If you have a G...

I set mt=1 in the ini file but Scorpio still uses 2 cores of my 4-core engine. What shall I do?

Thanks Vivien.

I'd prefer the opinion of NNUE experts. How much human work and how much CPU work is involved? It is irrelevant how many threads you use, if less then you will have to wait longer for the computer to finish but the human input does not change, IMO.

To develop a chess engine usually takes several monts, years or even a lifetime. But how much work is it to take an existing engine and replace its NNUE with a different one? In my naive view, to make an NNUE you collect a huge amount of games, determine which features of positions you want to analy...