TalkChess.com

Yet somehow Houdini is able to circumvent syzygy's shortcomings.

I can confirm your observation as well. Also tried houdini with syzygy and there it worked as expected.

neelbasant wrote:SF latest DEv version is a beast.
Thanks again for the good patch.
(070814 latest)

Neel

Waiting for the Large Page support.

Thx Jeroen!

Strange, someone with Jewish blood visiting the grave of an anti-Semite.

It takes Houdini 52 seconds to switch to Be3, whereas Stockfish needs less than a second. 24/55 0:01 0.00 1...Kd4 2.Ng2 Kc4 3.Ne1 Kd4 (15.914.257) 12185 TB:25 25/55 0:02 0.00 1...Kd4 2.Ng2 Kc4 3.Ne1 Kd4 (25.830.629) 12526 TB:77 26/55 0:02 0.00 1...Kd4 2.Ng2 Kc4 3.Ne1 Kd4 (34.347....

You show no understanding of the real situation. Your game was won by black almost right out of book and both engines knew it looking at the evaluation.

Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand

Have fun.

Fourth game of the evening, hardware with 10% difference, 6 piece sysygy: [Event "Rated game, 5 min"] [Site "Engine Room"] [Date "2014.03.11"] [Round "?"] [White "Houdini 4 Pro x64"] [Black "Stockfish 100314 64"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "C89"] [WhiteElo "2569"] [BlackElo "2615"] [Annotator "0.00;0.00"] ...

My post isn't about a single game, about winning or loosing. It's about a pattern I see on a regular basis and that is that Houdini gets outplayed by Stockfish and doesn't have a clue until it's too late. The game posted is merely an example. What surprises me most is the immaturity of a certain per...

Thanks Anil for pointing to that topic. Looking at the last post on page one and I see exactly what I am talking about, but now in a slow game. In the 27th round, Houdini probably lost due to a bug. After 49...Qb7 evaluation and depth were abnormal until 56...Nxe5 : 49.Nd4 -0.28/32 3:23 Qb7 -1.63/40...