TalkChess.com

Great stuff Larry, keep it up.

Fritz 5.32

Thank you Mark!

Thank you Steve, I'm enjoying playing it very much!

Does anyone know a good engine which fits this category? The most important thing is it's stable, I need to be able run a long match with it in the Fritz GUI


Thanks!

I understand, and I would prefer e.g. a "time to depth x"(*) comparison. But I didn't find any other performance figures from the cluster yet, than these nps which are from a Rybka 4 benchmark page. I think that page was initially intended to compare "normal" comps running retail Rybka 4. *) I gues...

Bob, If a Bulldozer processor had 4 modules and therefore 8 'cores' (I have read your argument above, hence the quotes) - how many chess engines could such a processor run: 4 or 8? I use IDeA a lot so this is relevant to me. I don't understand whether such a processor is basically a fast quad or a c...

you can still use the book in Chessbase's software though by exporting it within the Shredder interface as an engine book.

It won't allow you to see the lines though.

I am having some strange results in my engine vs engine tournaments without houdini 1.5 - rybka 4 seems very strong -- it is about even to ivanhoe over a long series of games -- at time control of 0+4s I use this control to offset any possible bugs in arena and also to possibly make R4 stronger sin...

Yet again you've delivered. Thank you!