TalkChess.com

... For computers, there is no strategy or tactics. It's just calculation. Strategy and tactics are meaningful concepts only for human chess thinking. I agree. Moreover what is tactics play, what is strategical play is only the question of definitions. In my mind, tactics are search/lookahead, and ...

I received a request to make a generic non-popcount 64 bit compile of Stash-bot v12, so here it is:

https://mega.nz/#!G1sD3CJQ!FZAsMQ97NjYc ... OkasfWX81o

Maybe they wanted to show off that their fake device can handle FRC.

I created a 64 bit windows executable for Stash 11.0.1:

https://mega.nz/#!PgUX1K4K!myQDEiRtOdQa ... 9nsMgcwlqQ

Take a look at the arg option for passing command line parameters.

viewtopic.php?t=27024&start=20#p257083

Tinman 0.2.0, including author's compiles (Is the windows compile popcount? It does not work for me on this old machine).
https://github.com/mikeleany/tinman/releases/tag/v0.2.0

Windows msvc compiles:
https://mega.nz/#!jh0DiQgY!ZAecSOWLJN7_ ... lelpOF2MWI

I have created Windows compiles for Tinman 0.1.2: https://mega.nz/#!blMl2SDJ!7H7w1XJHqX3uSp2kB7QVCPoiPSDIkrDdCVo7UsnZCqE Source code: https://github.com/mikeleany/tinman/releases/tag/v0.1.2 Raven 0.80: https://github.com/sgriffin53/raven/releases/tag/0.80 Absolute Zero 3.3.2.0: https://github.com/zo...

Another periphery question: Is there some sort of procedure to get an engine on a rating list (like CCRL)? Do I have to submit the source to another forum or something? All you have to do is announce that you have a release version of your engine here. Most of the CCRL testers come here regularly. ...

The old version of SEE is on the CCRL rating list. It is just called SEE 0.6.9 there, and is only on the blitz rating list, not the 40/15 list. Technically, your engine name is slightly different, because see is all lower case, and there is no space in the name of your engine.

I have made a compile of Tinman 0.1.1 and placed it here:

https://mega.nz/#!j0kkTaQK!TQZTWjMPc7p3 ... qVJZD3EJrc