TalkChess.com

2141 is my current top net ... Going to test 2051 against it. 2051 seems the best: 20+0.1 # PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%) 1 stnnuesergio20200725-2051 : 2858.2 1.9 4785.0 9453 50.6% 2 stnnuesergio20200722-2141 : 2853.8 1.9 4668.0 9453 49.4%

New test against the latest net 20+0.1 # PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%) 1 stnnuesergio20200725-2051 : 2858.7 2.6 2032.5 4004 50.8% 2 stnnuesergio20200726-1135 : 2853.3 2.6 1971.5 4004 49.2% 2141 is my current top net ... Going to test 2051 against it.

20200725-2051.bin seems better than 20200723-0511 after a few hundred games. I publish the test later with more games. About equal here after 500 games (to 2141). Is possible that is a tiny bit stronger. 20+0.01 # PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%) 1 stnnuesergio20200725-2051 : 2856.6 2.7 2301...

20200725-2051.bin seems better than 20200723-0511 after a few hundred games. I publish the test later with more games. About equal here after 500 games (to 2141). Is possible that is a tiny bit stronger. 20+0.01 # PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%) 1 stnnuesergio20200725-2051 : 2856.6 2.7 2301...

20200725-2051.bin seems better than 20200723-0511 after a few hundred games. I publish the test later with more games.

My best one is 2141 from 22.07, one before yours. Not enough games: 20+0.1 # PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%) 1 stnnuesergio20200723-0511 : 2857.0 2.9 1706.5 3393 50.3% 2 stnnuesergio20200722-2141 : 2855.0 2.9 1686.5 3393 49.7%

Someone tested experimental nets? I don't see many comments about them.

2344 For me the best net was 20200723-0511. Comparing it against 20200724-2344 after 1500 games 20+0.1 probably does not change this: # PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%) 1 stnnuesergio20200723-0511 : 2859.0 4.5 792.0 1558 50.8% 2 stnnuesergio20200724-2344 : 2853.0 4.5 766.0 1558 49.2%

Why hasn't anybody asked noobpwnftw of ChessDB fame for his data? I think he has more than 10 billion positions analyzed with some 22 Depth or something, maybe training from that would be good. Why hasn't anybody trained a NNUE based on Leela's eval? There's people without GPUs that haven't been ab...

Stockfish Dev 1706 vs sergio 20200722-1517 200 + 2: # PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%) 1 stnnuesergio20200722-1517 : 2886.5 10.8 160.5 274 58.6% 2 st200617 : 2825.5 10.8 113.5 274 41.4% Games: https://1drv.ms/u/s!Aj8wlSmr_Hq3irYFs2REWTBwPoJkdg?e=BTECXZ