TalkChess.com

Would you mind providing a compile of 7.78, so that I may add it to the release?

Thanks, as always!

Hmm.. I can't believe I have not added NPS to the output. I guess I got used to the GUI I use doing the math for me. I will be sure to include this in the next version.

Yes I can. I have been meaning to start doing that.

Thanks for testing the android compiles for me.

Can you give this executable a shot?

https://github.com/AndyGrant/Ethereal/b ... st-Android

If that works, then I'll go through and fix .75, .76.

Two things. 1) I accidentally dropped a -march=armv5 flag from the make file 2) I am using a different compiler, now compiling from win, not Linux. I'm away from home at the moment, but when I get back I'll update the make file, and swap the Android executables in each of the zips found in /dist. I'...

That happens when the evaluation is re-written, as well as the search :)

Things have changed a lot since 6.26, which I believe you made the initial post about!


Thanks for following development,
Andrew Grant

Rather, whatever the most current version of Ethereal is!

https://github.com/AndyGrant/Ethereal/releases

Hello all, It's been a good while since I've made any substantial changes. Took some time off to develop a testing framework of my own creation, and also lost out on some free time now that I'm back in University. Ethereal7.78 is about 60ELO stronger than Ethereal7.70 Ethereal7.78 is about 40ELO str...

What i mean is this:

Using 1+.01s time control will not be useful when you make a change regarding null pruning above depth 12. Or any other search features that are not triggered due to low time = low depth. That is a case I would say does NOT cut it

It seems to me that I should be able to test evaluation weight (changed values of PSQT, changed values of outposts... ect) with incredibly low time controls. Something like 1+.01s. This will be my first time playing around with just evaluation weights, so I've never done this testing before. Is ther...