1 second is a very long time on a modern computer. And in the middlegame the time per move is around 2-3 seconds and 0.5 seconds in endgame. 1 second per move is the average time per move displayed by the LittleBlitzerGUI (for all moves in all games played by one engine).
Best - Stefan
Search found 1546 matches
- Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:29 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches
- Topic: LS-rankinglist: restart with double thinking-time
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1063
- Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:59 pm
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches
- Topic: LS-rankinglist: restart with double thinking-time
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1063
LS-rankinglist: restart with double thinking-time
The LS-rankinglist (LightSpeed-rankinglist), now restarted with more than double thinking time (45''+500ms instead of 20''+250ms) Intel i7-2630QM (SSE42 support, Windows 7 64bit, 2 GHz Quadcore, FritzMark=20.2), 64 MB Hash, 1 core per engine (Hyperthreading off), no ponder, no endgame-bases, no resi...
- Wed Aug 15, 2012 5:16 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches
- Topic: LS-rankinglist: Gull 2 beta2
- Replies: 0
- Views: 358
LS-rankinglist: Gull 2 beta2
The LS-rankinglist (LightSpeed-rankinglist), now with Gull 2 beta2. Intel i7-2630QM (SSE42 support, Windows 7 64bit, Quadcore, FritzMark=20.2), 64 MB Hash, 1 core per engine (Hyperthreading off), no ponder, no endgame-bases, no resign. 500 selected opening-positions (all 8 moves deep, from Frank Q.-...
- Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:41 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches
- Topic: Houdini 2.0c T3-setting test (10000 games)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 858
Re: Houdini 2.0c T3-setting test (10000 games)
The 10000 games test of the T3-setting was for the LS-rankinglist and did not include games against Houdini 2.0c default. The test of the settings (inclusive T3) against Houdini 2.0c default was a test in advance to find the best setting for the final testrun for the LightSpeed-rankinglist. Best - S...
- Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:21 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches
- Topic: Houdini 2.0c T3-setting test (10000 games)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 858
Houdini 2.0c T3-setting test (10000 games)
The T3-setting played 10000 games (LS-rankinglist conditions, same opponents as Houdini 2.0c default) and scored 0.6% weaker than the default-engine. So it will not be in the LS-rankinglsit - who cares about a setting, which is not better than the default-engine? (-0.6% in 10000 games is inside erro...
- Sat Aug 04, 2012 8:19 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches
- Topic: LS-rankinglist: Bouquet 1.4
- Replies: 1
- Views: 386
LS-rankinglist: Bouquet 1.4
The LS-rankinglist (LightSpeed-rankinglist), now with Bouquet 1.4. Intel i7-2630QM (SSE42 support, Windows 7 64bit, Quadcore, FritzMark=20.2), 64 MB Hash, 1 core per engine (Hyperthreading off), no ponder, no endgame-bases, no resign. 500 selected opening-positions (all 8 moves deep, from Frank Q.-d...
- Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:16 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches
- Topic: LS-rankinglist: Stockfish 120727Q
- Replies: 0
- Views: 294
LS-rankinglist: Stockfish 120727Q
The LS-rankinglist (LightSpeed-rankinglist), now with Stockfish 120727Q (120727 was weaker!). +10 Elo to Stockfish 2.2.2. Stockfish 120622 deleted (2979 Elo (+5 Elo to Stockfish 2.2.2)) Intel i7-2630QM (SSE42 support, Windows 7 64bit, Quadcore, FritzMark=20.2), 64 MB Hash, 1 core per engine (Hyperth...
- Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:03 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches
- Topic: LS-rankinglist: Komodo 5
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1670
Re: LS-rankinglist: Komodo 5
My own view is that such ultra-fast tests are useful for comparing upgrades of one engine to another (although the elo gain will be overstated a bit), but not so useful for comparing unrelated engines. All engines using the Ippo code or search algorithms seem to be extremely strong at such very fas...
- Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:46 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches
- Topic: LS-rankinglist: Komodo 5
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1670
Re: LS-rankinglist: Komodo 5
Before this version of the LS-rankinglist, I had the TEB-rankinglist and a LS-rankinglist, which were the same except the thinking time. TEB had 60''+750ms. The results were the same (all differences were inside errorbar), so I decided the TEB-speed is to slow, it is better to have more games than l...
- Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:42 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches
- Topic: LS-rankinglist: Komodo 5
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1670
LS-rankinglist: Komodo 5
The LS-rankinglist (LightSpeed-rankinglist), now with Komodo 5. +52 Elo. Nice. But still no MP-version – not nice... Intel i7-2630QM (SSE42 support, Windows 7 64bit, Quadcore, FritzMark=20.2), 64 MB Hash, 1 core per engine (Hyperthreading off), no ponder, no endgame-bases, no resign. 500 selected op...