Traditional chess games and chess topics in general
Moderators: hgm , Rebel , chrisw
Henk
Posts: 7221 Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:31 am
Post
by Henk » Thu Dec 01, 2016 3:29 pm
whereagles wrote: Henk wrote: Karjakin said in Press Conference that he was not in good shape last day.
Funny.. against stockfish im always in bad shape
At least it is inefficient to think long. Why make blunders after move 35 if you can make them after move 14 ?
Also one should think mostly only in opponents time unless opponent is a speed chess champion.
Sean Evans
Posts: 1777 Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:58 pm
Location: Canada
Post
by Sean Evans » Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:56 pm
The short time control games were more interesting and exciting than the long time control games
They should just play Rapid 30 10 games for the WCC 2017.
Sean
michiguel
Posts: 6401 Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:30 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Post
by michiguel » Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:13 pm
whereagles wrote: michiguel wrote:
But the beauty is that MC saw the whole thing before reaching this position.
Not sure he saw "the whole thing", as in.. the mate-in-12 or so if black plays Bf8 instead of Kh7 😆
Of course he calculated to the last move. IF Bf8 you play Rxf8+ followed by Rxf7+ Ke8 Rf8+ with an easy mate pattern afterwards.
Carlsen must have seen the whole sequence when he played Rc1.
Miguel
michiguel
Posts: 6401 Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:30 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Post
by michiguel » Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:15 pm
Dirt wrote: michiguel wrote: But the beauty is that MC saw the whole thing before reaching this position. There were other "safe" alternatives (a draw would have been enough), but he went for the jugular with a couple of minutes on the clock.
So, are we just going to ignore that he went from a tablebase win to a draw in the second game?
Yes, because I did not even watch that game
Miguel
(Personally, I had no clue how to do it. But, I'm not such a good player.)
whereagles
Posts: 565 Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:03 pm
Post
by whereagles » Fri Dec 02, 2016 2:21 am
michiguel wrote: Carlsen must have seen the whole sequence when he played Rc1.
The queen sac he definitely saw. The follow up to Bf8 im willing to bet he trusted his instincts eheh
Look
Posts: 366 Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 2:14 pm
Location: Iran
Full name: Mehdi Amini
Post
by Look » Fri Dec 02, 2016 8:07 am
michiguel wrote:
WOW.
I just watched the end live. What a way to finish the match. Brilliant execution by Magnus.
Miguel
I watched the rapids tiebreaks, games were very interesting.
Farewell.
gerold
Posts: 10121 Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: van buren,missouri
Post
by gerold » Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:33 pm
Look wrote: michiguel wrote:
WOW.
I just watched the end live. What a way to finish the match. Brilliant execution by Magnus.
Miguel
I watched the rapids tiebreaks, games were very interesting.
I agree the last games were the most exciting. Very good.
Henk
Posts: 7221 Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:31 am
Post
by Henk » Sat Dec 03, 2016 12:24 pm
Karjakin lost because no communist party supporting the team.
It's over. Karpov, Kasparov were the last.
AdminX
Posts: 6344 Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: Acworth, GA
Post
by AdminX » Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:30 pm
Henk wrote: Karjakin lost because no communist party supporting the team.
It's over. Karpov, Kasparov were the last.
I think he lost more so because he was trying to hold (Carlson), more than he was trying to win. By hold, I mean hold him to a draw of course.
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers
Henk
Posts: 7221 Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:31 am
Post
by Henk » Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:56 pm
I mean relatively less money available, worse training, worse selection.