To put everything into place with Strelka

Sylwy · Post by **Sylwy** » Fri May 11, 2007 2:12 pm

Which version of Rybka please ??????
Thx in advance !!!!!!!
Sylwy

Rob · Post by **Rob** » Fri May 11, 2007 2:14 pm

mclane wrote:
Yes I have decompiled Strelka and Rybka and they're the same.
do you have any evidence to support this statement ?

Yes, I could give a commented analysis of source code but that would give away Rybka secrets. We're waiting for somebody with 'authority' to make an informed statement.

mclane · Post by **mclane** » Fri May 11, 2007 2:17 pm

you mean somebody from the RYBKA team ?!

who are you ? Your profile is not giving any data.
Maybe you can say, without giving sources, in other words, what you or
"we" found out.

your statements are / were so strict that IMO you should open your cards.

Sylwy · Post by **Sylwy** » Fri May 11, 2007 2:20 pm

Nice to keep Rybka's secrets only for you ?

Alexander Schmidt · Post by **Alexander Schmidt** » Fri May 11, 2007 2:41 pm

Rob wrote:Yes I have decompiled Strelka and Rybka and they're the same.

Hahahahahahaha!

At least funny you are...

gerold · Post by **gerold** » Fri May 11, 2007 2:59 pm

Sergei Markoff wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
Sergei Markoff wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:Why are you showing us Smarthink when you have the Strelka code?

Why not show us the Strelka interface instead?

It's useless to anyone without the rest of Strelka anyway.
To be a honest I need a permission from author to do it.
I think, that Bryan's opinion will be enought to stop speculations. Are you agree with it?
No.

Dann Corbit's opinion is the one that counts and always has.
Looks you are not very friendly.
You're don't trusting both me and Bryan Hoffmann?..

I have not heard from the author on the question. Of course
Dann opinion is good and so is Christopher's opinion.
You really don't have to gave the code to anyone. With such
a strong engine i would keep the code to myself and go
comm. with it.

Gerold.

Alexander Schmidt · Post by **Alexander Schmidt** » Fri May 11, 2007 3:10 pm

Sylwy wrote:Happy to read a such well-mannered, honest & professional man like you.A true German spirit !

Hello Sylwy,

I guess you don't read german forums

Best,
Alex

Alexander Schmidt · Post by **Alexander Schmidt** » Fri May 11, 2007 3:16 pm

Chan Rasjid wrote:(remember Rybka do not know how to mate kqk)

Hello Rasjid,

nice hint. Strelka has no problems mateing in kqk endgames.

[Event "Computer Schach Partie"]
[Site "Stuttgart"]
[Date "2007.05.11"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Strelka"]
[Black "Alex"]
[Result "1-0"]
[BlackElo "2350"]
[Time "15:12:30"]
[TimeControl "60+1"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "8/8/3K4/5Q2/8/8/4k3/8 w - - 0 1"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "13"]
[WhiteType "program"]
[BlackType "human"]

1. Qe4 {(f5e4 e2d2 d6c5 d2c1 e4g2 c1d1 c5d4 d1c1 d4c3 c1d1 g2f1) +319.00/9
0} Kf2 2. Ke5 {(d6e5 f2g3 e4e3 g3g2 e3e2 g2g1 e5f4 g1h1 f4f3 h1g1 e2f2)
+319.00/8 0} Kg3 3. Qe3 {(e4e3 g3g2 e3e2 g2g1 e5f4 g1h1 f4f3 h1g1 e2f2)
+319.00/6} Kg2 4. Qe2 {(e3e2 g2g1 e5f4 g1h1 f4f3 h1g1 e2f2) +319.00/5 0}
Kg3 5. Kf5 {(e5f5 g3h3 f5f4 h3h4 e2g4) +319.00/5} Kh3 6. Kf4 {(f5f4 h3h4
e2g4) +319.00/2 0} Kh4 7. Qg4 {(e2g4) +319.00/1 Matt} 1-0

Best,
Alex

Sylwy · Post by **Sylwy** » Fri May 11, 2007 3:20 pm

I don't speak German.So sorry !
Sylwy

Chan Rasjid · Post by **Chan Rasjid** » Fri May 11, 2007 3:20 pm

What astonishes me: Why does the programmer do the effort to make an engine, but takes he no effort to tell something about it. For example some release notes, FAQ and so on. Confused Confused Confused Confused

Don't be surprise, I have the following and there is no readme :-

Ali, Nano, Collossus, Feuer, Naum, etc.... and you don't know what your against.

Rasjid

To put everything into place with Strelka

Re: Correct fen

Re: Correct fen

Re: Correct fen

Re: Correct fen

Re: Correct fen

Re: To put everything into place with Strelka

Re: Thank you Alexander

Re: To put everything into place with Strelka

Re: Thank you Alexander

Re: To put everything into place with Strelka