Bona fide or FIDE - if its the latter maybe an open letter is needed!?Graham Banks wrote:I don't count his wins on time as bona fide wins Gerold.gerold wrote: If Pablo can draw and beat top computers, looks like the computers
have a ways to go.
How Long?
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
Harvey Williamson
Re: How Long?
-
Tony Thomas
Re: How Long?
Hey dont make fun of Rybka.Harvey Williamson wrote:Bona fide or FIDE - if its the latter maybe an open letter is needed!?Graham Banks wrote:I don't count his wins on time as bona fide wins Gerold.gerold wrote: If Pablo can draw and beat top computers, looks like the computers
have a ways to go.
-
Terry McCracken
Re: How Long?
Regardless he wins, due to the fact he creates positions where computers can't use their calculative ablities, imprisoning them behind pawn chains et al.Graham Banks wrote:I don't count his wins on time as bona fide wins Gerold.gerold wrote: If Pablo can draw and beat top computers, looks like the computers
have a ways to go.
Nemeth takes a different approach, and often gets wins. So there is still lot's of work to be done.
Terry
-
Terry McCracken
Re: How Long?
You raised a very good point, and it will take some time before computers can win consistently against a very strong player let alone a GM in corr.Laszlo Gaspar wrote:Hi all!
In my opinion we can state that machines are better when they are better at all time controls (correspondence chess included), and the difference is bigger with longer time.
I think we haven't reached this point yet...
Terry