Maybe a better defence for Kramnik?

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

bigo

Maybe a better defence for Kramnik?

Post by bigo »

Perhaps the Deep Fritz 10 Re3 Novelty isn't so great, rybka seems to elegantly refudiate it.






[Event "Dual Core 4200 2475mhz 1 Gig, Blitz:60'"]
[Site "DualCore 4200+ Oc'2442mhz"]
[Date "2007.08.03"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Fritz 10"]
[Black "Rybka 2.3.2a"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B86"]
[Annotator "0.36;0.15"]
[PlyCount "126"]
[TimeControl "3600"]

{AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ 2420 MHz W=17.6 ply; 1,186kN/
s; 278,903 TBAs B=19.7 ply; 113kN/s; 15,076 TBAs} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4
cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bc4 e6 7. O-O Be7 8. Bb3 Qc7 9. Re1 Nc6 10. Re3
O-O 11. Rg3 {Both last book move} Kh8 {0.15/16 168} 12. Nxc6 {0.36/16 105} bxc6
{0.13/17 71} 13. Qe2 {(Bf4) 0.24/17 144} d5 {(Rb8) 0.17/16 211} 14. e5 {
0.52/16 95} Nd7 {(Ng8) 0.08/17 56} 15. Bf4 {0.79/16 101} g6 {(Rd8) 0.08/16 88}
16. Re1 {(Bh6) 0.77/15 105} Kg8 {(Rb8) 0.04/16 502} 17. Rh3 {(Qh5) 0.66/15 108}
Rb8 {(Rd8) 0.00/15 73} 18. Qd2 {(Qe3) 0.66/16 65} Re8 {0.10/16 143} 19. Qd3 {
(Na4) 0.64/15 8} a5 {-0.20/16 108} 20. Qe2 {(Na4) 0.54/14 62} Nc5 {
(Bf8) -0.34/15 60} 21. Qd2 {0.43/15 72} Ba6 {(h5) -0.32/15 103} 22. Bg5 {
0.40/16 150} Bf8 {-0.11/17 92} 23. Bh6 {0.40/14 0} Qe7 {(Red8) -0.13/16 135}
24. Bxf8 {(Qe3) 0.46/14 113} Qxf8 {(Rxf8) -0.14/16 20} 25. a3 {0.71/15 137} h5
{-0.16/16 41} 26. Nd1 {(Rb1) 0.60/16 53} a4 {(Rb5) -0.27/18 104} 27. Ba2 {
0.43/17 72} Re7 {(Ne4) -0.27/17 7} 28. Qd4 {0.73/16 47} Reb7 {-0.27/17 25} 29.
Qe3 {(Ree3) 0.66/16 85} Qe7 {(Rxb2) -0.32/17 87} 30. Bb1 {(Qd4) 0.44/16 47} Bc4
{-0.48/16 53} 31. Kh1 {(Qd4) 0.37/17 19} Rd7 {(Qf8) -0.53/16 84} 32. Qd4 {
0.50/16 51} Ne4 {(Rdd8) -0.59/17 16} 33. c3 {(f3) -0.14/16 70} Bb3 {-0.54/17 48
} 34. f3 {-0.14/17 8} Bxd1 {-0.62/17 14} 35. Rxd1 {-0.20/17 24} Ng5 {-0.68/18 8
} 36. Rg3 {-0.27/17 49} Rxb2 {-0.80/18 4} 37. Qxa4 {-0.31/16 48} Rdb7 {
(c5) -0.81/19 28} 38. Bd3 {-0.21/16 56} h4 {(Nh7) -0.81/19 19} 39. Rg4 {
-0.32/16 49} h3 {-0.75/18 0} 40. Qf4 {-0.59/15 45} hxg2+ {-0.78/17 29} 41. Rxg2
{-0.81/17 34} Rxg2 {-0.90/19 14} 42. Kxg2 {-0.81/16 3} Nh7 {-0.94/19 74} 43. a4
{(h4) -0.91/16 0} Rb2+ {-1.00/16 26} 44. Rd2 {-1.02/17 15} Qa3 {-1.04/18 12}
45. c4 {-1.04/16 27} Rxd2+ {-1.12/18 71} 46. Qxd2 {-1.25/17 0} Qxa4 {
-1.16/19 92} 47. Qc1 {(cxd5) -1.32/16 0} Nf8 {(Qa2+) -1.45/16 34} 48. f4 {
(Bf1) -1.57/15 59} Qa2+ {(Nd7) -1.70/17 31} 49. Qc2 {(Kg1) -1.61/17 56} Qxc2+ {
-1.54/16 0} 50. Bxc2 {-1.33/17 10} dxc4 {-1.84/23 2} 51. Kf3 {-1.66/19 37} Nd7
{-1.99/26 0} 52. Ke3 {-1.94/18 87} c5 {-2.34/29 48} 53. Ba4 {-2.43/19 5} Nb6 {
-2.94/28 73} 54. Bb5 {-2.52/20 0} Nd5+ {-3.16/27 49} 55. Kd2 {-2.52/20 0} c3+ {
-3.16/27 24} 56. Kc2 {-2.73/20 41} Kg7 {-3.16/28 17} 57. Ba4 {(Kd3) -2.70/18 29
} Nxf4 {-3.53/23 14} 58. Kxc3 {-3.45/19 28} g5 {-3.93/24 15} 59. Kc4 {
-3.80/19 10} Ng6 {-4.06/23 8} 60. Kxc5 {-3.80/20 31} Nxe5 {-4.19/25 22} 61. Bb5
{(Kd6) -4.08/19 69} g4 {-4.52/22 31} 62. Bf1 {(Be2) -5.74/18 55} Nf3 {
-5.12/18 25} 63. Bg2 {(Kd6) -6.02/18 49} f5 {(Nxh2) -5.38/16 22} 0-1
Dr.Ex
Posts: 194
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:10 am

Re: Maybe a better defence for Kramnik?

Post by Dr.Ex »

You can hardly speak about a refutation here.
I don't like the Qeen shuffling Qe2,Qd2,Qd3,Qe2,Qd2.
In spite of that white can easily hold the balance with 24.Bg5.
IMHO 24.Bxf8 is a very bad move by Fritz.