Rogozenko Picture

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: bob, hgm, Harvey Williamson

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
User avatar
Eraserheads
Posts: 227
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 8:19 am
Location: Quezon City, Philippines
Contact:

Rogozenko Picture

Post by Eraserheads » Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:41 pm

http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=4467

Check the placement of the White King and Queen in Rogozenko's photo. Sorry I'd post in the general discussions forum but I can't seem to find it, so I posted here.

playjunior
Posts: 338
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 10:53 pm

Re: Rogozenko Picture

Post by playjunior » Fri Feb 22, 2008 5:22 pm

Hilarious.

Gabinoz
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 4:56 pm

Re: Rogozenko Picture

Post by Gabinoz » Fri Feb 22, 2008 6:39 pm

It's just a new chess variant...

ArmoredGuns

Re: Rogozenko Picture

Post by ArmoredGuns » Sat Feb 23, 2008 2:23 am

Haha, good find.

Tony Thomas

Re: Rogozenko Picture

Post by Tony Thomas » Sat Feb 23, 2008 5:57 am

Believe it or not, a lot of people does that. I was playing against one of my friends about a month ago. Regardless of how hard I argued he said that the king and queen placements arent parallel. Finally I said OK, and won all 4 games. :wink:

User avatar
Ovyron
Posts: 2740
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 2:30 am

Re: Rogozenko Picture

Post by Ovyron » Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:17 am

Tony Thomas wrote:Finally I said OK, and won all 4 games. :wink:
Great, but then you didn't beat him at chess. ;)

Tony Thomas

Re: Rogozenko Picture

Post by Tony Thomas » Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:21 am

Ovyron wrote:
Tony Thomas wrote:Finally I said OK, and won all 4 games. :wink:
Great, but then you didn't beat him at chess. ;)
It is true that I didnt beat him in classical chess. FRC??

User avatar
Ovyron
Posts: 2740
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 2:30 am

Re: Rogozenko Picture

Post by Ovyron » Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:24 am

Tony Thomas wrote:It is true that I didnt beat him in classical chess. FRC??
If you were using FRC castling rules then yes :)

swami
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:21 am

Re: Rogozenko Picture

Post by swami » Sat Feb 23, 2008 8:28 am

Tony Thomas wrote:
Ovyron wrote:
Tony Thomas wrote:Finally I said OK, and won all 4 games. :wink:
Great, but then you didn't beat him at chess. ;)
It is true that I didnt beat him in classical chess. FRC??
Shuffle Chess.

Not FRC since your friend presumably wouldn't have known about the castling rules in frc then.

I think Shuffle Chess is more interesting than FRC in computer chess, fair and square, since most of the engines play shuffle just fine and there is no need for newer code implementation for castling rules. I think you would enjoy watching engines play each other in shuffle :wink:

I don't know why it is not popular or why it is not even getting a least bit of attention amongst testers.

Gabinoz
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 4:56 pm

Re: Rogozenko Picture

Post by Gabinoz » Sat Feb 23, 2008 1:58 pm

Not FRC, but Rogochess

Post Reply