Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
swami
- Posts: 6640
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am
Post
by swami »
Graham Banks wrote:
How does Lime 66 (2278 CCRL) compare scorewise?
Cheers,
Graham.
Here it is, Graham:
Lime 66
by Richard Albert.
Strategic Test Suite Conditions:
Arena GUI
10 seconds per position
800 positions
Core2Quad 32 bits, Q6600, 2 GB RAM, 2.4GHZ
Engine uses 126 Mb Hash.
Subject-wise Scores:
STS (v1.0) - Undermining:
55/100, Grade: C+
STS (v2.0) - Open Files and Diagonals:
51/100, Grade: C
STS (v3.0) - Knight Outposts/Centralization/Repositioning:
64/100, Grade: B
STS (v4.0) - Square Vacancy:
51/100, Grade: C
STS (v5.0) - Bishop vs Knight:
67/100, Grade: B+
STS (v6.0) - Re-Capturing:
59/100, Grade: C+
STS (v7.0) - Offer of Simplification:
50/100, Grade: C
STS (v8.0) - Advancement of f/g/h Pawns:
26/100, Grade: ?
Overall Performance:
Total Score: 423/800
Overall Average: 52.875 %
Grade: C
Regards,
Swami
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 41423
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Post
by Graham Banks »
swami wrote:Graham Banks wrote:
How does Lime 66 (2278 CCRL) compare scorewise?
Cheers,
Graham.
Here it is, Graham:
Lime 66
by Richard Albert.
Overall Performance:
Total Score: 423/800
Overall Average: 52.875 %
Grade: C
Regards,
Swami
I'm wondering if a 40 point difference in STS score equates to roughly 100 ELO rating points. It would be interesting to investigate this.
Thanks,
Graham.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
Richard Allbert
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:58 am
Post
by Richard Allbert »
Thanks for those results.
Richard