Steve B wrote:Several posts in this thread have been removed due to complaints and charter violations
if a post of yours is missing as a result of splitting the thread
we apolgize for the inconvience
members should refrain from making OT posts that have nothing to do with computer chess
So posts about Panda, Norton, McAfee, Kaspersky, etc. are not OT right?
Great job Steve, really great job...
loosely related ..yes
as we have discussed now for the past 30 minutes by PM
Steve
Peter Skinner wrote:It is a clone. Do you honestly believe he took "ideas" from Ippolit, Crafty, Stockfish and wrote a 3200 engine from scratch in a few months?
Please tell me you aren't that blind to the fact of what Houdini is? If so, I have a hell of a deal on a bridge with a prime location in San Fransisco. Some would call it a "Golden" opportunity. Interested?
Peter
I do not believe that based on ideas from Ippolit,Crafty and stockfish he wrote a 3200 engine from scratch in a few months but we do not know when he started but only when he released the first version and these things may be different.
It is possible that he started some years ago to learn from crafty and from Glaurung and started to write his engine in 2006.
I do not claim that Houdini is not a derivative of Ippolit(I do not know) but you need a better argument to convince me that it is a derivative of Ippolit(I prefer the word derivative and not a clone when there is a clear strength improvement even if 99% of the code is the same).
Uri
Osipov declared it a clear Ippolit derivative, albeit with a number of changes especially at the eval level, after RE-ing it. Since you say you don't *know*, what do you sincerely *believe*? I ask because I find these declarations of not knowing because the person doesn't have irrefutable proof to be the most insincere cop-out there is. It is an excuse to look away even though the person actually believes one thing, but hides behind the "don't know with irrefutable proof" declaration, which (no offense meant to you Uri) is pathetic.
Don't get me wrong, I have no doubt Houdart has put in a lot of work to achieve the improvements he did, which is another argument altogether, but I completely believe that he started with IPPO and that it is the foundation of 99% of its strength.
Who is this Osipov character? Is he the author of Strelka? When he was first known we only heard of him second hand and then only through translation from Russian that was very hard to understand. His first name has had three different spellings; Yuri, Jury and Juri. When he appeared here for the first time his English was very rough. Then nothing for awhile. Then when the Ipp* controversy started up he rejoined with nearly perfect English. At first he was in opposition to Vas and now he is a Vas supporter. What gives with citing him as a source? Does anyone know for sure that he is whom he says he is?
If you are on a sidewalk and the covid goes beep beep
Just step aside or you might have a bit of heat
Covid covid runs through the town all day
Can the people ever change their ways
Sherwin the covid's after you
Sherwin if it catches you you're through
Again, can I kindly invite you all to continue your "derivative" discussion outside this Houdini release thread?
Please stop polluting this thread with a rehash of arguments that have been repeated ad nauseam before, you make it very difficult for other people to find useful information about the release.
If you are on a sidewalk and the covid goes beep beep
Just step aside or you might have a bit of heat
Covid covid runs through the town all day
Can the people ever change their ways
Sherwin the covid's after you
Sherwin if it catches you you're through
Houdini wrote:Again, can I kindly invite you all to continue your "derivative" discussion outside this Houdini release thread?
Please stop polluting this thread with a rehash of arguments that have been repeated ad nauseam before, you make it very difficult for other people to find useful information about the release.
Thank you.
With all do respect Robert, you should ask moderation to do something about it. It's their job. The fact that they decided to ignore it, speaks a lot about them.
Now, I am sorry for disrupting your thread, but some pathetic accusations have been made on the course of this thread by one particular individual, well known for abusing moderator powers and influence so I would like to ask one question related to the discussion that moderators so openly decided to allow.
The question is related to Bob Hyatt.
Dear Professor Robert Hyatt,
In case you are not informed (as a member, and also as a moderator), some serious accusations (that arguably cross the line of personal attacks disallowed by the charter) have been laid here in this thread by a certain individual, presenting himself as a member of Your team.
Would You be so kind to exit Your hiding silence and explain to members of this forum do You and to which degree support these claims? Are these claims presented here in the name of Crafty team, or only in the name of the aforementioned individual? In case You completely support the claims presented would You be so kind to present some evidence that support those claims?
I consider You as an honest man that does not use libelous attacks and defamation unless he has very solid evidence to present.
Robert Flesher wrote:
If it is a clone, and to this we have seen NO evidence but only conjecture. The idea of Houdini < Rybka is clearly "Argumentum ad Novitatem" It is likely that he did exactly what VAS did. Looked at code (Vas ,used Fruit, Robert / Ippo*) saw the ideas, and made them better. If it's ok for Vas, it should be fine for Robert. If it is only a clone why is it so much stronger ?
From a customer point of view, ( I paided good money for Rybka 2, 3, 4), Robert provides a stonger, better analysis tool, far better endgame player, and regular updates. All for free! If tommorrow he was to sell the next version, I'd buy it.
Lastly, Houdini appears to be at very least 50 ELO stronger than Rybka 4.0. Give credit where credit is due! As envy is the pursuit of fools, and you do not strike my as such.
What I am saying it is a clone of Ippolit, nothing more, nothing less. Has it improved on the original source. Sure. Am I saying people can't use it? Obviously no, as that is your choice, just as it is mine to not use it or any of the other derivatives in that family of engines.
Nor am I envious of what he has accomplished. Being on the Crafty team has taught me that even 1-5 elo gains are impressive, because the hard work involved and the insane amount of testing that goes into each of those small incremental increases feels awesome when they are verified improvements.
Taking someone's code, improving on it slightly when you already have one of the strongest source projects to start as a base doesn't impress me. Write something from scratch that beats the #1 program by 50 elo and I will be impressed.
My initial question was to see the source based on Robert Houdart's claim that he used "ideas" from Crafty. He states there is no actual code, and I have nothing to refute that with as there is no source to look at. So I have to take his word on that until one day it might be released.
In my opinion it is a clone, and I'm entitled to that opinion just like you are yours.
Peter
You know what doesn't impress me? Your self righteous attitude. Goes for some of the other cronies around here that commented on my comments telling you to give Robert some due. Now that hes told you he didn't use any crafy code ....where is the "I'm sorry Robert for accusing you without proof. I must of got out of the wrong side of bed" ...goes for Graham and Albert silver too. You guys are quick to mouth off and bad mouth and real slow with the apologies. Funny how that goes ...its all about what you want and demand with no apologies now that you have your answer with your stinking attitudes...but but Robert had best do this if hes a decent guy. Try being decent yourself first ...take a look in the mirror guys. The second you get your answer you immediately respond with the above post moving right along with how its ippo now which again would be none of your concern. Why most go to Open Chess forum now.
Michael Sherwin wrote:
Who is this Osipov character? Is he the author of Strelka? When he was first known we only heard of him second hand and then only through translation from Russian that was very hard to understand. His first name has had three different spellings; Yuri, Jury and Juri. When he appeared here for the first time his English was very rough. Then nothing for awhile. Then when the Ipp* controversy started up he rejoined with nearly perfect English. At first he was in opposition to Vas and now he is a Vas supporter. What gives with citing him as a source? Does anyone know for sure that he is whom he says he is?
Hi Michael !
STASI knows something ! Is a friend/alter ego of Herr Sergei S. Markoff -the author of a chess engine called SmarThink ( 1.0/1.1 & 1.2 -Lokasoft ).
Other informations like present on Chritmas !