bob wrote:
This is pretty funny. And also just a "tad" hypocritical. For the longest, you stated "Fabien doesn't have a problem with this so it is ok." Now it appears that he _does_ have a problem with it, and now his opinion doesn't matter?
Look up "hypocrite" and think about it.
Please try to differ. What I said about Fabien when there was no public concern, I took the easiest argument against the Vas critics and said Fabien didnt say something qhixch was true after I had read Dann Corbit. Now Fabien is concerned and I argue that nothing has been decided legally against Vas. Would you deny that?
As we know at least in Germany, if someone sees a direct and urgent need to get legal assistance then this is possible to get usually after advice by a lawyer. All that is still not done or not publicly announced. So why attacking me, Bob? I did not say or mean that I have nothing seen from critics like you that accused Vas. That would be a lie because you have made your public statement. But again, this isnt yet a legal verdict.
I think it would almost make us really decent, if we could differentiate. Although we know all the critics, we still treat Vas as innocent and with politeness until he would be sentenced to any real punishment either financial or else. My term innocent means in a legal sense just that Vas never was convicted by a court and this is what is essential. So, he's no liar nothing. And especially Graham therefore should also be treated with respect.
And we should behave this way NOT only for any thinkable advantage of Vas but for the best of our little community.
Also to Keith. Hostility doesnt lead anywhere. Yes, many here see him under suspicions, but then it's our legal system that must tear the conclusions but not we in a sort of social branding. Let's show some style. If we could wait for 5 years now let''s wait what Fabien could achieve during his attempts now. But calling Vas guilty just because Fabien appeared on the scene now this is neither fair nor well designed for our community.