I think we need to decide if people are more important, or ELO ratings.fern wrote:I believe that If an engine is based -how much heavy is heavily?- on another engine with no legal problems as effect of that AND the guy say he has made such use of another guy code, it is ethically acceptable.
If the supposed author try to pass as one, enterily original author, there we have a lier.
An engine that has made legal use of another code and is recognized as such, the i take it like a variant, an improvemente perhaps and I see no problem on that.
Fern
If you love computer chess, you need to also respect the dignity and incredible hard work of the people who provide you with these programs - and in my view that is the real travesty here.