rybka 1.0 beta
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 4:55 pm
I wish people wouldn't hate rybka so much. I dont think computer chess would be where it is today if it wasn't for rybka 1.0 beta.
We don't hate Rybka,we hate it's authorjmartus wrote:I wish people wouldn't hate rybka so much. I dont think computer chess would be where it is today if it wasn't for rybka 1.0 beta.
I have no doubt about this. But hate is bad for your health, Dr. Wael.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:We don't hate Rybka,we hate it's authorjmartus wrote:I wish people wouldn't hate rybka so much. I dont think computer chess would be where it is today if it wasn't for rybka 1.0 beta.
Well,hate in general is a negative emotion,I do agree....but I make exception for Rybka's author,it charges me with positive energyPauloSoare wrote:I have no doubt about this. But hate is bad for your health, Dr. Wael.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:We don't hate Rybka,we hate it's authorjmartus wrote:I wish people wouldn't hate rybka so much. I dont think computer chess would be where it is today if it wasn't for rybka 1.0 beta.
I think it would be better off if Mr. Rajlich and Rybka had never entered the market. Having a chess engine much higher than any other doesn't encourage competition, it stifles it. It gives commercial programmers little reason to compete, since few people will buy #2 when #1 is much stronger. It takes money out of their pockets and makes development less profitable----indeed, probably not worth their time.jmartus wrote:I wish people wouldn't hate rybka so much. I dont think computer chess would be where it is today if it wasn't for rybka 1.0 beta.
.......LOL...........Tom Barrister wrote: I think it would be better off if Mr. Rajlich and Rybka had never entered the market.
My nephew just asked me: "What kind of gay name is "Ruxy" anyway? It sounds like the name for a poodle."Sylwy wrote: Vas used the Fruit code ? Maybe ! But the result is a wonder.
From years nobody was able to do a such chess engine. Publishing Deep Rybka -for free- on "that" forum
Well Tom , Earth is a small planet !Tom Barrister wrote:
My nephew just asked me: "What kind of gay name is "Ruxy" anyway? It sounds like the name for a poodle."
Well , well, well -Mr.Tom Barrister is for sure a programer ! Guess who ?Tom Barrister wrote: If he (Mr. Rajlich) is such a great programmer, why does Rybka still have multiple bugs, almost 10 months after it was released, and even after a very belated bugfix update? Why are things still broken? We all know the answer to that one. It's hard to use somebody else's code, let alone the code of probably 20 others, and make it work. It requires skill. Apparently that's not one of Mr. Rajlich's talents.
If Rybka is so great, why does it suck bananas in the endings? Old Spike 1.2, which is ranked way down in most lists, took a lost 8 piece ending and drew it against Rybka---this at 40/40 time controls. The same position was reversed, and Spike won it easily.
WOW , money for nothing ( a Dire Straits famous song) ?Tom Barrister wrote: My copy is paid for, although I never use it.
It's an evolution law here (Darwin ,Spencer & co.). They show us that sons/daughters are -often-over the parents. What can we do ?Tom Barrister wrote: There's nothing that I want it to do that Houdini, Stockfish, Critter, and others, don't do as well or better.
Answer the question: If Mr. Rajlich is such a great programmer why does Rybka 4 still have multiple bugs, almost 10 months after it was released?Sylwy wrote:blah blah baby-talk blah
My friend,Tom Barrister wrote:Answer the question: If Mr. Rajlich is such a great programmer why does Rybka 4 still have multiple bugs, almost 10 months after it was released?Sylwy wrote:blah blah baby-talk blah
Nothing to say about it?
Didn't think so.