Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
i dont need any help,it was a line which my opponent did not play which i thought was very strong.Roger Brown wrote:Hello Paul,
If this is a live correspondence game should you be doing this?
It seems a bit dubious to ask for assistance in analysing positions on a forum. Kind of pointless too, considering the machines one has access to nowadays...
Later.
to clarify,it was an overnight run on a 12 core(not threads) overclocked computer and very very difficult to find even when you go directly to the f4 move.it was 3 moves earlier when i found it.evals start at 0.00 and just continue to rise and rise,not saying game was lost but it had me sweating due to my complacent play.NATIONAL12 wrote:i dont need any help,it was a line which my opponent did not play which i thought was very strong.Roger Brown wrote:Hello Paul,
If this is a live correspondence game should you be doing this?
It seems a bit dubious to ask for assistance in analysing positions on a forum. Kind of pointless too, considering the machines one has access to nowadays...
Later.
learned a big lesson here and am not afraid to tell a story against myself.
! Maybe it's a pity your opponent chose another variation than you anticipated, for spectacle I mean, but then you would rather have switched colours I suppose. 31. Ng3 maybe was not best after all if the game was an indication; the Knight went f3 - h2 - f1 - g3 - f1 - e3 -c4 - a5 - b3 maybe it lost some time there. But you mentioned in the thread later that Nh2 was a strong move that even Nelson Hernandez had not made green in his database, so maybe this was all planned? Tried to format the game as pgn: