Rebel wrote:He is available for 1-2 days to any question you might have.
so why does he ignore this one
Parent - By Loboestepario (****) [us] Date 2012-01-08 16:52
Would you like to provide a technical commentary on Mark Watkins' response to the 4-part article published by Chessbase? http://harveywilliamson.com/ICGA/Riis3.pdf
Rebel wrote:He is available for 1-2 days to any question you might have.
so why does he ignore this one
Parent - By Loboestepario (****) [us] Date 2012-01-08 16:52
Would you like to provide a technical commentary on Mark Watkins' response to the 4-part article published by Chessbase? http://harveywilliamson.com/ICGA/Riis3.pdf
Me ?
No.
I refer to my own stuff.
But perhaps Soren might.
please read what YOU wrote
clearly you string puller is cherry picking what to answer AND ignoring the tearing to shreds of riess's pathetic smokescreen of misinformation and untruths
Rebel wrote:The attitude I notice, VIG because he did not speak, now that he is starting to speak still VIG.
Typical.
The attitudes here or on Rybka dont matter really Ed
its just cheerleading for or against
Rajlich's responses are all that matters
Zach has asked his first question directly to Rajlich
personally if i were a moderator on Rybka i would keep that thread clear of Rybka 5 Release date questions ,fan club kudos and other unrelated issues
that thread is quite important
Would you like to provide a technical commentary on Mark Watkins' response to the 4-part article published by Chessbase?
[url]http://harveywilliamson.com/ICGA/Riis3.pdf[/url]
Rebel wrote:The attitude I notice, VIG because he did not speak, now that he is starting to speak still VIG.
Typical.
Ed ( Mr Schroder )
Surly by now you can see vas ignores simple facts and thinks all should do the same to feed his ego and bank account
the little pat on your head from him on rybka cannot stop you thinking for yourself if you really want to
if you put half the time and effort into your engine as you do into defending the indefensible then you would be right up there and respected for it
Would you like to provide a technical commentary on Mark Watkins' response to the 4-part article published by Chessbase?
[url]http://harveywilliamson.com/ICGA/Riis3.pdf[/url]
You simply ain't going to get an answer to that question. Just like you get no answers to ANY "hard questions". Just a deflection to something else.