benchmark new smartphones: (Old Thread)

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Dann Corbit, Harvey Williamson

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
Locked
User avatar
JuLieN
Posts: 2948
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 10:16 am
Location: Nantes (France)
Contact:

Re: benchmark new smartphones: huawei ascend p6

Post by JuLieN » Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:48 pm

kinderchocolate wrote:iPhone 5s, 64 bits, iOS 7 Stockfish

1152 KN/s
Image

Wo-awww! Thanks for the bench, Ted! (And how did you get an iPhone 5S so early? ;) )

Can you confirm that it only has 2 cores ? How much memory ? What frequency ?

Code: Select all

iPhone 5S &#40;2 Cores&#41;                     1.152.000 <-- new
Samsung Galaxy Note2 &#40;4 cores&#41;            714.000
ASUS Transformer TF300T &#40;4 cores&#41;         661.000
Asus Infinity tf700 &#40;4 cores&#41;             590.000
Galaxy S3 &#40;4 cores&#41;                       574.000
Pipo max M9 &#40;4x cortex a9 1.6 ghz&#41;        526.000
LG Optimus 4xHD &#40;4 cores&#41;                 521.000
ZTE geek v975 &#40;2+2HT intel atom&#41;          511.000
iPad4 &#40;2 cores&#41;                           510.000
Nexus 10  &#40;2 cores&#41;                       510.000
Amoi N828 &#40;4 cores MTK6589 @ 4x1,2GHz&#41;    493.000
iPhone 5 &#40;2 cores&#41;                        476.800
HTC one X tegra3 &#40;4 cores&#41;                470.000
google nexus 7 tablet pc &#40;4 cores&#41;        457.000
SamsungGalaxy S4&#40;1.9Ghz,4 cores,1GBhash&#41;  450.000
Asus Transformer Prime &#40;4 threads&#41;        440.435
HTC one                                   438.000
Huawei P6 &#40;Hi-SiliconK3V2 4x1.5&#41;          405.000
Google Nexus4 &#40;4 cores&#41;                   400.000
Xiaomi Mi2                                386.000
Sony Xperia Z &#40;4 cores&#41;                   376.000
Oppo Find 5                               368.000
Samsung Galaxy 3 &#40;2 core&#41;                 333.567
Galaxy Note                               329.000
Trekstor Surftab                          305.000
iPad mini &#40;2 cores&#41;                       277.500
iPad3 &#40;2 cores&#41;                           277.000
Ipad2 &#40;2 cores&#41;                           274.000
Motorola Razr i &#40;2 cores hyperthread&#41;     271.000
Sony Experia S &#40;2 cores&#41;                  259.000
samsung galaxy S2                         253.000
iPhone 4S &#40;Apple A5&#41;                      225.500
Lenovo A660 &#40;2 cores&#41;                     222.000
Advent Vega Tegra2                        220.500
Sony Tablet S                             218.000
Motorola Razr xt910 &#40;2 cores&#41;             216.000
Motorola Razr HD                          212.000
LG Optimus Speed P990 &#40;2 cores&#41;           200.000
HTC one S qualcomm s4 &#40;2 cores&#41;           200.000
Samsung Galaxy SIII 1.5GHz &#40;2 Cores&#41;      189.867
Motorola Razr i &#40;1 core&#41;                  186.000
Nuu Nu1 &#40;qualcom dualcore 1.7 Ghz&#41;        142.000
samsung epic                              141.000
HTC Flyer, 1.5 Ghz                        140.000
Advent Vega Tablet &#40;2 cores&#41;              137.126
Dell Streak                               133.000
Samsung Vibrant                           111.000
Samsung Galaxy Tab                        108.500
LG Optimus 2x                             102.000
HTC HD2 1 Ghz 1 core                       94.000
HTC Desire S                               90.000
HTC Desire                                 84.000
iPhone 4                                   80.000
ipod touch 4                               78.000   
samsung galaxy s                           70.000
7-inch Barnes and Noble Color              62.500
Sony PRS-T1 ebook-reader                   53.817
iPhone 3GS                                 51.000
HTC Wildfire S                             31.000
Android phone Qualcomm 600MHz &#40;1 core&#41;     25.750
Ipod touch 2nd gen                         16.500
Palm Pre oc. 1Ghz &#40;Webos1.4.5&#41;             16.000
ZT-180 10,2" Pad                           15.345
Palm Pre oc. 800mhz &#40;Webos1.4.5&#41;           13.000
APAD Rockchip 600mhz &#40;android1.5&#41;          10.000
Palm Pre 500mhz &#40;Webos1.4.5&#41;                8.000
"The only good bug is a dead bug." (Don Dailey)
Image [Blog: http://tinyurl.com/predateur ] [Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/fbpredateur ] [MacEngines: http://tinyurl.com/macengines ]

User avatar
Laskos
Posts: 10949
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:21 pm
Full name: Kai Laskos

Re: benchmark new smartphones: huawei ascend p6

Post by Laskos » Thu Sep 19, 2013 11:24 pm

Wow, this iPhone 5S is faster than my netbook.

jhellis3
Posts: 488
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:36 pm

Re: benchmark new smartphones: huawei ascend p6

Post by jhellis3 » Fri Sep 20, 2013 12:14 am

The 5s is dual core, 1.3GHz, 1GB LPDDR3 courtesy of anandtech.

kinderchocolate
Posts: 451
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:55 am
Full name: Ted Wong
Contact:

Re: benchmark new smartphones: huawei ascend p6

Post by kinderchocolate » Fri Sep 20, 2013 12:15 am

Because I was at the line outside the Apple Store .... There were many many people stayed overnight outside the Apple Store .... Some had even installed a tent ... The new phone is super fast. iOS 7 lags a little bit even on iPhone 5, but it's all perfect on the iPhone 5s. Someone should do an identical benchmark for the iPhone 5, that is, running the iOS 7 version on the iPhone 5.

kinderchocolate
Posts: 451
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:55 am
Full name: Ted Wong
Contact:

Re: benchmark new smartphones: huawei ascend p6

Post by kinderchocolate » Fri Sep 20, 2013 12:32 am

iOS 7 on the iPhone 5s is totally amazing. Give up your Android and join iOS!

kinderchocolate
Posts: 451
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:55 am
Full name: Ted Wong
Contact:

Re: benchmark new smartphones: huawei ascend p6

Post by kinderchocolate » Fri Sep 20, 2013 12:37 am

The iPhone 5C doesn't feel or look like a "cheap" phone. The build is quite good, and the plastic is definitely a high-premium material. Strongly recommended for an upgrade.

Jhoravi
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 4:49 am

Re: benchmark new smartphones: huawei ascend p6

Post by Jhoravi » Fri Sep 20, 2013 5:00 am

kinderchocolate wrote:iPhone 5s, 64 bits, iOS 7 Stockfish

1152 KN/s
Amazing performance for a lowly 1.3ghz dual core!

The extra large 128kb L1 cache of the iPhone5s CPU really make a big difference for chess! That's twice bigger even against our desktop PC cache. Compare that to the latest Snapdragon 800 2.3ghz with only 16kb instruction +16kb data = 32kb total L1 cache.

melajara
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:39 pm

Re: benchmark new smartphones: huawei ascend p6

Post by melajara » Fri Sep 20, 2013 7:22 am

with 1.15 M NPS, I guess the iPhone 5s will be the new flagship of this long list of smartphones for a while and by quite a margin :D

For comparison purposes, is there such a list issued for laptop or even desktop computers?
Per ardua ad astra

kinderchocolate
Posts: 451
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:55 am
Full name: Ted Wong
Contact:

Re: benchmark new smartphones: huawei ascend p6

Post by kinderchocolate » Fri Sep 20, 2013 8:08 am

According to various published benchmark, the dual core A7 chip is faster than the Samsung Galaxy S4. Samsung knew it, they announced it recently that the new S5 will move into the 64 bits and they will do everything to catch up.

Tord Romstad
Posts: 1808
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:19 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: benchmark new smartphones: huawei ascend p6

Post by Tord Romstad » Fri Sep 20, 2013 8:27 am

kinderchocolate wrote:iPhone 5s, 64 bits, iOS 7 Stockfish

1152 KN/s
Sounds really good. I want that phone.

To get a perspective of how much faster the new CPU is: Can someone please benchmark the same SF version on an iPhone 5? Use the opening position, and run the program in analysis mode for a minute or so. I'm perfectly aware that the iPhone 5 is already included on the list of benchmarks posted in this thread, but that number is probably for an older SF version compiled with an older compiler version, and therefore not directly comparable to the new iPhone 5s benchmark.

I get 250 kN/s on my iPhone 4s, and 300kN/s on my iPad 3.

Locked