Unclear N+5P vs. B+6P endgame.

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

rodolfoleoni
Posts: 263
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: Unclear N+5P vs. B+6P endgame.

Post by rodolfoleoni »

Andre wrote:[d]8/6p1/1bk2p1p/1p1ppP2/1P1P2P1/1NK4P/8/8 b - - 0 1 [/d]
Don't think you can win this 1... Bxd4+ 2.Nxd4 exd4 3.Kxd4 Kd6 4.h4 would be draw as White replies Kd4 when Black King comes to d6 (after the waiting move h4 if necessary and having Black to play = mutual zugzwang).
In the diagram position if h6 pawn was on h4 then it's another story because White doesn't have waiting moves.
White could have tried 3.Kd3 (instead of taking d4 pawn) but Black replies ...Kc7 2.Kxd4 and Kd6 Zugzwang
Quite interesting. I'll give it to Baron Deeplearn feature. Let us see if it finds something. :)
Rodolfo (The Baron Team)
rodolfoleoni
Posts: 263
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: Unclear N+5P vs. B+6P endgame.

Post by rodolfoleoni »

rodolfoleoni wrote:
Andre wrote:[d]8/6p1/1bk2p1p/1p1ppP2/1P1P2P1/1NK4P/8/8 b - - 0 1 [/d]
Don't think you can win this 1... Bxd4+ 2.Nxd4 exd4 3.Kxd4 Kd6 4.h4 would be draw as White replies Kd4 when Black King comes to d6 (after the waiting move h4 if necessary and having Black to play = mutual zugzwang).
In the diagram position if h6 pawn was on h4 then it's another story because White doesn't have waiting moves.
White could have tried 3.Kd3 (instead of taking d4 pawn) but Black replies ...Kc7 2.Kxd4 and Kd6 Zugzwang
Quite interesting. I'll give it to Baron Deeplearn feature. Let us see if it finds something. :)
Yes, it finds it draw after deepening the tree and backscoring it. So, Bxd4 would be a mistake here. ;)
Rodolfo (The Baron Team)
Dicaste
Posts: 142
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:23 pm
Location: Istanbul, TURKEY

Re: Unclear N+5P vs. B+6P endgame.

Post by Dicaste »

I'm still analyse.

FEN: 8/3kb1pp/4pp2/1p1p4/1P1P1PP1/3NK2P/8/8 b - - 0 1

Code: Select all

Houdini 2.0c x64 w/ Gaviota and Nalimov TB
 Bd8 Nc5+ f5 exf5 gxf5 g5 Ne6 Kd7 Nc5+ Kc6 Kf3 h5 Nd3 Bb6 Ke3 Bc7 Ne1 Bd6 Nc2 Bf4+

Code: Select all

Critter 1.4 SSE4 x64 w/ Gaviota TB
Bd6 h4 Bb8 Nc5+ Ke7 h5 Ba7 Kd3 g6 hxg6 hxg6 Kc3 Bb8 Nd3 Bd6 Kd2 Bc7 Kc2 Bb6 Nc5
neelbasant
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Unclear N+5P vs. B+6P endgame.

Post by neelbasant »

Ajedrecista wrote:Hello to everybody:

Yesterday I played a LTC game (30' + 30"/move) at LiChess, although both my opponent and me spent little time to reach this position IIRC:

[d]8/3kb1pp/4pp2/1p1p4/1P1P1PP1/3NK2P/8/8 b - - 0 1

I was black (so, I was a pawn up) and had something like 37 minutes on the clock; my opponent had around 32 minutes. He/she offered a draw and I accepted... my endgame skills are limited, my playing style is dull and I am not ambitious at chess.

But today, giving short tries to some top engines, their evals were between -0.56 (Houdini 1.5a at depth 24/47, suggesting ..., Bd8) and -1.49 (SF 2.2.2 at depth 31/49, suggesting ..., g6). The end of the suggested mainlines by Critter 1.4, Deep Rybka 4.1, Houdini 1.5a, Komodo 3, Quazar 0.4 and SF 2.2.2 are not clear to me (only seeing the new positions, without analysing with engines), from my patzer POV.

Then, I tried the extreme cases (less eval and greater eval):

This position is reached by the last mainline that SF 2.2.2 calculated:

[d]8/8/2k2p1p/1pPpP2P/1P6/8/2K5/8 b - - 0 1

And then, SF evaluates it as -1.73 at depth 33/53 (obviously suggesting ..., PxP). But the passed pawns of both sides prevent both kings of make progressions.

-----------------------

This position is reached by the last mainline that Houdini 1.5a calculated:

[d]8/6p1/1bk2p1p/1p1ppP2/1P1P2P1/1NK4P/8/8 b - - 0 1

And then, Houdini evaluates it as -0.68 at depth 28/52 (suggesting ..., e4). The position is still unclear to me, there is like no real progress can be made.

So, the initial position should be a draw or a win by black? Please post about this endgame.

I am not an expert on computer chess, but I think that engines sometimes have problems in some endgames... maybe also here? I hope this position will be enjoyable for players and useful for programmers.

Regards from Spain.

Ajedrecista.
Please, Do not confuse with engine evaluation which is plus/minus numerical output.
Numerical value of -1.00 or equal can confirm win / loss respectively in opening or initial middle game.( effective because of more materials)

But in endgame where pawns are equal or +- 1 with different colored Bishops or Bishop vs Knight or Night vs Knight , engines showing +- in terms of material value ( in numerical) up to 3.00 is understood as draw.
( Must have blocked/semi blocked position )

It depends on the entry of King into the enemy's territory ,blocked/semi-blocked pawn structure and so on, as list of conditions are long.


So as for given position which is
1.Semi-blocked in term of pawn structure and entry for Bishop.
Donot count Kinght.
2.No entry for king into enemy territory.( Blocked)
although both Kings are placed in good squares.

Now i think , you will understand whether given position is winning or losing.

Neel Basant