Deep Rybka 4 was destroyed in 16-0.Man versus Machine.Father

[Father]

Trying playchess.com
Connected
Login
Welcome, Grand-father!
Server Time = 18:18 (UTC+1h), 6706 users online
Stockfish 250114 64 SSE4.2 (6 cores): 32.9 plies; 11.246kN/s Intel(R)
Core(TM) i7 CPU X 980 @ 3.33GHz 3340MHz

[pgn][Event "Rated game, 5 min"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2014.01.25"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Grand-father"]
[Black "Heikoschach"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "D00"]
[WhiteElo "1965"]
[BlackElo "2416"]
[PlyCount "154"]
[EventDate "2014.01.25"]
[TimeControl "300"]

1. d4 {1} c6 {B 0} 2. e3 {1} d5 {B 0} 3. c3 {2} Bf5 {0.01/26 11} 4. f4 {1 (Sd2)
} e6 {-0.31/25 9} 5. Nf3 {3 (Le2)} Nf6 {-0.18/25 8} 6. Bd3 {1 (Le2)} Nbd7 {-0.
43/25 12} 7. a3 {1 (Lxf5)} Be7 {-0.64/24 6} 8. O-O {4 (Lxf5)} O-O {-0.57/24 14}
9. Re1 {1 (b3)} Rc8 {-0.75/23 10} 10. b4 {3 (Lxf5)} a5 {-0.88/23 5} 11. Qc2 {
3 (Lb2)} Bxd3 {-0.88/26 4} 12. Qxd3 {1} Ra8 {-0.87/29 5} 13. Bb2 {2} Ne4 {-0.
87/29 1} 14. Nbd2 {2} Ndf6 {-0.88/29 2} 15. Qc2 {1} b5 {-0.90/28 4} 16. Nxe4 {2
} Nxe4 {-0.90/28 1} 17. Nd2 {0} Nxd2 {-0.90/26 3} 18. Qxd2 {1} f5 {-0.90/27 2}
19. g3 {2 (Tec1)} g6 {-0.94/25 4} 20. Kg2 {1 (Tf1)} a4 {-0.92/24 4} 21. h4 {3
(Th1)} Kf7 {-0.95/29 5} 22. Rh1 {1 (De2)} Rg8 {-0.95/30 4} 23. Rag1 {1 (De2)}
Qf8 {-0.95/30 4} 24. Kf1 {1 (Kf2)} Ke8 {-0.95/32 4} 25. Qe2 {1} Kd7 {-0.95/30 2
} 26. Qf3 {1 (Ke1)} h6 {-1.06/26 4} 27. Rh3 {1 (De2)} Rh8 {-1.06/27 9} 28. Rgh1
{3 (h5)} Qg7 {-0.97/25 4} 29. Ke2 {2 (Dg2)} g5 {-1.09/29 5} 30. hxg5 {3} hxg5 {
-1.09/34 0} 31. Rxh8 {2 (Df1)} Rxh8 {-1.04/35 3} 32. Bc1 {5 (Kf2)} gxf4 {-1.08/
34 5} 33. Rxh8 {5 (gxf4)} Qxh8 {-1.22/35 4} 34. gxf4 {4 (exf4)} Qh2+ {-1.16/35
4} 35. Qf2 {3 (Kd1)} Qh1 {-1.00/36 3} 36. Qf1 {3} Qe4 {-0.90/38 0} 37. Bd2 {14
(Kd2)} Kc7 {-0.82/35 6} 38. Qc1 {7 (Kd1)} Qg2+ {-0.82/33 3} 39. Kd1 {4 (Kd3)}
Qf3+ {-0.74/33 5} 40. Kc2 {2} Qe2 {-0.80/36 3} 41. Qd1 {8} Qg2 {-0.80/36 0} 42.
Qe1 {3 (Kd3)} Kd7 {-0.72/36 3} 43. Kc1 {1 (Kd1)} Qf3 {-0.72/38 3} 44. Qd1 {3}
Qg4 {-0.72/41 1} 45. Qf1 {6 (Le1)} Bf6 {-0.72/42 3} 46. Kc2 {3 (Le1)} Kd6 {-0.
64/37 7} 47. Qf2 {3 (Le1)} Bh4 {-0.56/37 3} 48. Qf1 {3} Qg3 {-0.56/39 0} 49.
Qe2 {3} Be7 {-0.56/39 0} 50. Qe1 {3 (Kd1)} Qf3 {-0.72/35 2} 51. Kc1 {3 (Dd1)}
Bd8 {-0.72/37 8} 52. Qd1 {2} Qg2 {-0.72/38 0} 53. Qe1 {2} Kd7 {-0.72/39 1} 54.
Qd1 {1 (Kd1)} Bh4 {-0.72/34 2} 55. Kc2 {3 (Le1)} Qe4+ {-0.72/35 2} 56. Kc1 {3}
Qd3 {-0.72/37 0} 57. Qh1 {11 (Dg1)} Bf6 {-0.64/32 2} 58. Qd1 {5 (Dg2)} Bd8 {-0.
72/35 5} 59. Qc2 {4} Qf1+ {-0.72/39 0} 60. Qd1 {4} Qg2 {-0.72/40 0} 61. Qe1 {2}
Bf6 {-0.72/36 1} 62. Qd1 {3 (Kd1)} Qf2 {-0.72/37 2} 63. Qe1 {1} Qf3 {-0.72/39 0
} 64. Qd1 {1} Qg2 {-0.72/38 1} 65. Qe1 {1 (Dh5)} Be7 {-0.64/37 5} 66. Qd1 {1
(Kc2)} Qh2 {-0.56/39 12} 67. Qc2 {3 (Df3)} Bh4 {-0.56/35 2} 68. Qd1 {1} Bf2 {
-0.56/36 1} 69. Qf1 {6 (De2)} Ke7 {-0.56/33 2} 70. Qe2 {5} Qh4 {-0.56/37 0} 71.
Kc2 {2} Kf6 {-0.40/36 0} 72. Kd3 {5} Bg3 {0.00/34 0} 73. Qf1 {3} Qh2 {0.00/37 0
} 74. Kc2 {2 (Le1)} Kg6 {0.00/32 1} 75. Kd3 {4} Bh4 {0.00/40 0} 76. Kc2 {3
(Le1)} Kf7 {0.00/31 2} 77. Kd3 {2} Bf2 {0.00/33 1 (Lag: Av=0.33s, max=0.8s)}
1/2-1/2

[/pgn]

[skoony]

hey moderators.
why is this not considered spamming?
i think its time father got his own website to self promote himself on.

respectfully submited.

mike

[Father]

...Mike. I don't understand the meaning of your post and sentence. Of course that it is much easier for people than be interested in learn about the incredible advance of chess softwares and hardware Develoment in the last 3 years, to have some games in order &. classified.
If you study and paid attention to the lines of these games, you are going to learn, that these games, are very different that the post you could search about 3 years ago.
Just as example ... Houdini 4, it is absolutely difficult for understanding for our human being intelligence ... Houdini 4, it is obstinate and a real soldier playing against a wall of pawns.
I Invited to you just to try to play in Main Hall in playchess.com against "Engine challenge", a machine hangle for Roger, if you want to have a remote idea about what difficult is to take just a draw playing computers.
Deep blue is in newdays, a baby playing computer chess, not better to 2770 elo.... Today a smartphone could to send to Deep blue to the chair.
Stand up and go to the black board and teach to everybody how easy is play and task a draw or a victorie on time playing against an enemy or machine that is looking you 38-4 plies move per move ...
Talkchess is a democratic space for writers and players of chess and mathematicians and scientific community.
... now I have search 6% as performance playing top chess computers....my goal is to search a 20% performance in man versus machine to 2014.
...
thanks to playchess, thanks to Roger, thanks to Houdini, Komodo, stockfish players and authors, and about my past tense, thanks to Hydra, fritz, Shreder, junior, and many others, like comp quark, and chess tiger.
Mike ... Simplicity is more difficult than confusion playing chess computers ... I believe this is the way, the secret for go and to rest in the fortress.. "The little GATE"

[skoony]

...Mike. I don't understand the meaning of your post and sentence. Of course that it is much easier for people than be interested in learn about the incredible advance of chess softwares and hardware Develoment in the last 3 years, to have some games in order &. classified.
If you study and paid attention to the lines of these games, you are going to learn, that these games, are very different that the post you could search about 3 years ago.
Just as example ... Houdini 4, it is absolutely difficult for understanding for our human being intelligence ... Houdini 4, it is obstinate and a real soldier playing against a wall of pawns.
I Invited to you just to try to play in Main Hall in playchess.com against "Engine challenge", a machine hangle for Roger, if you want to have a remote idea about what difficult is to take just a draw playing computers.
Deep blue is in newdays, a baby playing computer chess, not better to 2770 elo.... Today a smartphone could to send to Deep blue to the chair.
Stand up and go to the black board and teach to everybody how easy is play and task a draw or a victorie on time playing against an enemy or machine that is looking you 38-4 plies move per move ...
Talkchess is a democratic space for writers and players of chess and mathematicians and scientific community.
... now I have search 6% as performance playing top chess computers....my goal is to search a 20% performance in man versus machine to 2014.
...
thanks to playchess, thanks to Roger, thanks to Houdini, Komodo, stockfish players and authors, and about my past tense, thanks to Hydra, fritz, Shreder, junior, and many others, like comp quark, and chess tiger.
Mike ... Simplicity is more difficult than confusion playing chess computers ... I believe this is the way, the secret for go and to rest in the fortress.. "The little GATE"

and your point is?

nothing to see here,move along regards,
mike

[Milos]

hey moderators.
why is this not considered spamming?
i think its time father got his own website to self promote himself on.

respectfully submited.

I had asked this question at least a half a dozen times, I even got banned for strongly objecting.
Self-appointed moderators here think they can do whatever they like obviously, and allowing spam is maybe not a policy but certainly reflects on the laziness of ppl doing moderation, where they prefer to do as little as possible.
The funny thing is they claim they don't like they are moderators, in the same time they do extremely lousy job, but like typical dictators they don't have any intention to step aside a let someone else do the job properly.
Power no matter how minuscule obviously corrupts...