Come on Sedat, below (don't you remember!)...Sedat Canbaz wrote:Unfortunately, the bellow ones
Is Windows XP Pro x64 dead for some Chess Engines ?
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:30 pm
Re: Is Windows XP Pro x64 dead for some Chess Engines ?
-
- Posts: 3018
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Antalya/Turkey
Re: Is Windows XP Pro x64 dead for some Chess Engines ?
Oh, yes...SORRYernest wrote:Come on Sedat, below (don't you remember!)...Sedat Canbaz wrote:Unfortunately, the bellow ones
-
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 9:44 am
Re: Is Windows XP Pro x64 dead for some Chess Engines ?
velmarin wrote:Probe is, with permission from Steve.Steve Maughan wrote:Hi Sedat,
Steve
Popcnt Version, intel 12.1, if we are lucky.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/eyatd7vsto2y83e/Maverick.7z
PS, Deep Smash, version Arsah in road.
Can you please provide all real changed files and not partial ones? Because these files do not fully correspond to the binary.velmarin wrote:Project and sourceSteve Maughan wrote:Thanks José!
Your version is about 18% faster than mine! Did you need to change the code at all?
Steve
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ekcjbi2dlk7xt ... RICKsrc.7z
-
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:48 am
Re: Is Windows XP Pro x64 dead for some Chess Engines ?
Project and sourcephenri wrote: Project and source
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ekcjbi2dlk7xt ... RICKsrc.7z
Can you please provide all real changed files and not partial ones? Because these files do not fully correspond to the binary.
It is up to the Visual C + + project loaded, otherwise it corresponds is that you've changed something(compiler or parameters).
Changes are only in the intrinsic popcount, bitsacn, not remember for sure.
The modified files are to date 2014-01-19
-
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 9:44 am
Re: Is Windows XP Pro x64 dead for some Chess Engines ?
I still come to check, and I confirm and sign: the files provided by you does not match the binary provided by you.velmarin wrote:Project and sourcephenri wrote: Project and source
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ekcjbi2dlk7xt ... RICKsrc.7z
Can you please provide all real changed files and not partial ones? Because these files do not fully correspond to the binary.
It is up to the Visual C + + project loaded, otherwise it corresponds is that you've changed something(compiler or parameters).
Changes are only in the intrinsic popcount, bitsacn, not remember for sure.
The modified files are to date 2014-01-19
Thank you
-
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:48 am
Re: Is Windows XP Pro x64 dead for some Chess Engines ?
Yeah, well,phenri wrote:I still come to check, and I confirm and sign: the files provided by you does not match the binary provided by you.velmarin wrote:Project and sourcephenri wrote: Project and source
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ekcjbi2dlk7xt ... RICKsrc.7z
Can you please provide all real changed files and not partial ones? Because these files do not fully correspond to the binary.
It is up to the Visual C + + project loaded, otherwise it corresponds is that you've changed something(compiler or parameters).
Changes are only in the intrinsic popcount, bitsacn, not remember for sure.
The modified files are to date 2014-01-19
Thank you
I must confess, I have a few secrets you can not disclose,
I wanted to trick Steve, but you found the evidence.
But do not tell anyone ....
Newly compiled, see date
-
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 9:44 am
Re: Is Windows XP Pro x64 dead for some Chess Engines ?
This screenshot is supposed to show what? Nothing that I already know.velmarin wrote:Yeah, well,phenri wrote:I still come to check, and I confirm and sign: the files provided by you does not match the binary provided by you.velmarin wrote:Project and sourcephenri wrote: Project and source
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ekcjbi2dlk7xt ... RICKsrc.7z
Can you please provide all real changed files and not partial ones? Because these files do not fully correspond to the binary.
It is up to the Visual C + + project loaded, otherwise it corresponds is that you've changed something(compiler or parameters).
Changes are only in the intrinsic popcount, bitsacn, not remember for sure.
The modified files are to date 2014-01-19
Thank you
I must confess, I have a few secrets you can not disclose,
I wanted to trick Steve, but you found the evidence.
But do not tell anyone ....
Newly compiled, see date
-
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:48 am
Re: Is Windows XP Pro x64 dead for some Chess Engines ?
phenri wrote:
If you want to know something, ask,
what is your problem ?.
Executable size is different ?.
Play different ?.
What is the difference you're worried ?.
Frankly, you got me intrigued.
-
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 9:44 am
Re: Is Windows XP Pro x64 dead for some Chess Engines ?
book options missingvelmarin wrote:phenri wrote:
If you want to know something, ask,
what is your problem ?.
Executable size is different ?.
Play different ?.
What is the difference you're worried ?.
Frankly, you got me intrigued.
-
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:48 am
Re: Is Windows XP Pro x64 dead for some Chess Engines ?
Above, Maverick64, original executable by Steve.
Down Maverick 0.51 x64 executable compiled by me.
If you want to know more, feel free to ask, if it is in my hand I will help you.
Down Maverick 0.51 x64 executable compiled by me.
If you want to know more, feel free to ask, if it is in my hand I will help you.