Hi all,
new cheng4 is available here http://vlasak.biz/cheng as usual.
Most of the gain (I expect some 30 real elo, maybe more) is due to eval tuning using "Texel tuning method" by Peter Osterlund (thanks).
Also thanks to Graham for providing book lines, Lars for testing and Emil for hosting.
cheng4 0.38 release
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 2554
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 2:00 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
- Full name: Martin Sedlak
-
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 9:51 am
- Location: Canada
- Full name: Jason Coombs
Re: cheng4 0.38 release
I'll be testing this for sure.
Thanks for the update Martin
and Graham, Lars and Emil
Jason
Thanks for the update Martin
and Graham, Lars and Emil
Jason
-
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 7:28 pm
- Location: Birmingham, England
Re: cheng4 0.38 release
The Linux compile, in particular, is much appreciated. Thank you!
Marek Soszynski
-
- Posts: 937
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 4:29 pm
- Location: Germany
-
- Posts: 1610
- Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 5:28 pm
- Location: USA
Re: cheng4 0.38 release
Its runs slower than .36c speed wise in the nodes, it is very noticeable to me.
This isn't necessarily a bad thing, I was just wondering what you did to this current version?
This isn't necessarily a bad thing, I was just wondering what you did to this current version?
"Without change, something sleeps inside us, and seldom awakens. The sleeper must awaken." (Dune - 1984)
Lonnie
Lonnie
-
- Posts: 2554
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 2:00 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
- Full name: Martin Sedlak
Re: cheng4 0.38 release
Are you sure? I don't see any decrease in nps from the startposition between 0.36c and 0.38.reflectionofpower wrote:Its runs slower than .36c speed wise in the nodes, it is very noticeable to me.
This isn't necessarily a bad thing, I was just wondering what you did to this current version?
Could you start 0.36c and type go depth 20 and do the same for 0.38 and post nps when it finishes?
-
- Posts: 1610
- Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 5:28 pm
- Location: USA
Re: cheng4 0.38 release
A SIGNIFICANT difference! newest version takes 40 seconds to reach 20 ply whereas older version takes 7 seconds! This is running 4 CPU's on an i7mar wrote:Are you sure? I don't see any decrease in nps from the startposition between 0.36c and 0.38.reflectionofpower wrote:Its runs slower than .36c speed wise in the nodes, it is very noticeable to me.
This isn't necessarily a bad thing, I was just wondering what you did to this current version?
Could you start 0.36c and type go depth 20 and do the same for 0.38 and post nps when it finishes?
I was also looking at the ply speed mainly so I should clarify mysef, node speed is the same but depth reached is much slower in new version.
"Without change, something sleeps inside us, and seldom awakens. The sleeper must awaken." (Dune - 1984)
Lonnie
Lonnie
-
- Posts: 2554
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 2:00 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
- Full name: Martin Sedlak
Re: cheng4 0.38 release
Ah yes so you mean nominal depth. Should be ok then. Also note that smp in nondeterministic.reflectionofpower wrote:A SIGNIFICANT difference! newest version takes 40 seconds to reach 20 ply whereas older version takes 7 seconds! This is running 4 CPU's on an i7
-
- Posts: 937
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 4:29 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: cheng4 0.38 release
Just out of curiosity, I ran a quick 500 games match, fixed depth 12, Cheng4 1 Thread against Cheng4 8 Threads.
Nice. I like it.
Code: Select all
Finished game 500 (Cheng4-1T vs Cheng4-8T): 1/2-1/2 {Draw by 3-fold repetition}
Score of Cheng4-8T vs Cheng4-1T: 152 - 114 - 234 [0.538] 500
ELO difference: 26
Finished match
Jörg Oster
-
- Posts: 1610
- Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 5:28 pm
- Location: USA
Re: cheng4 0.38 release
You could run a 1 thread verse a 48 thread, it makes no difference when running it into a depth limitation. They both reach 12 ply and then it's over. Try running it on 3 0 games and the 8 thread will cremate the solo act.Joerg Oster wrote:Just out of curiosity, I ran a quick 500 games match, fixed depth 12, Cheng4 1 Thread against Cheng4 8 Threads.
Nice. I like it.Code: Select all
Finished game 500 (Cheng4-1T vs Cheng4-8T): 1/2-1/2 {Draw by 3-fold repetition} Score of Cheng4-8T vs Cheng4-1T: 152 - 114 - 234 [0.538] 500 ELO difference: 26 Finished match
"Without change, something sleeps inside us, and seldom awakens. The sleeper must awaken." (Dune - 1984)
Lonnie
Lonnie