Komoko 9 Benchmarks - Post Here

[MikeB]

No ini file.
Default settings - single core.

Type "go depth 22" - should only take few seconds.

This is testing hardware - not the engine , so few words about your setup would be appropriate. Just copy and paste the last two lines.

I'll go first:

Code: Select all

info time 28934 nodes 52612628 nps 1818366 hashfull 982
bestmove e2e4 ponder e7e5

iMac 5K Retina  i7 4.0Ghz 32gb Ram 

If you keep the result pasting the results within my code brackets it will make it easier for those who want to see them and also easier for those that want to skip them

[Leto]

Info time 47087 nodes 52612628 nps 1117347 hashfull 982
bestmove e2e4 ponder e7e5
Intel Xeon X5650 12 cores, hyperthreading disabled.

[kgburcham]

5960x
8 cores @ 4.3
HT off

[daws]

Code: Select all

info time 28934 nodes 52612628 nps 1818366 hashfull 982
bestmove e2e4 ponder e7e5

iMac 5K Retina  i7 4.0Ghz 32gb Ram 


info time 29406 nodes 52612628 nps 1789154 hashfull 982
bestmove e2e4 ponder e7e5

4930k @ 4.4 ghz 

[MikeB]

Code: Select all

info time 28934 nodes 52612628 nps 1818366 hashfull 982
bestmove e2e4 ponder e7e5

iMac 5K Retina  i7 4.0Ghz 32gb Ram 


info time 29406 nodes 52612628 nps 1789154 hashfull 982
bestmove e2e4 ponder e7e5

4930k @ 4.4 ghz 

haha - exactly the same , down to the last ms as my iMac. Probably speaks more about Apple quality than anything else.

[daws]

Code: Select all

info time 28934 nodes 52612628 nps 1818366 hashfull 982
bestmove e2e4 ponder e7e5

iMac 5K Retina  i7 4.0Ghz 32gb Ram 


info time 29406 nodes 52612628 nps 1789154 hashfull 982
bestmove e2e4 ponder e7e5

4930k @ 4.4 ghz 

haha - exactly the same , down to the last ms as my iMac. Probably speaks more about Apple quality than anything else.

Well actually I don't have an iMac, I just copied and pasted my 4930k results into your code brackets. I thought that was what you wanted when you wrote:

If you keep the result pasting the results within my code brackets it will make it easier for those who want to see them and also easier for those that want to skip them

[RJN]

My new 5930K rig, still being tweaked. OCed so far stable @ 4625 MHz (125 x 37, 64 GB Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR4 @ 3000 MHz, MB Asus X99 Deluxe).

Code: Select all

info time 28934 nodes 52612628 nps 1818366 hashfull 982 
bestmove e2e4 ponder e7e5 

iMac 5K Retina  i7 4.0Ghz 32gb Ram 


info time 29406 nodes 52612628 nps 1789154 hashfull 982 
bestmove e2e4 ponder e7e5 

4930k @ 4.4 ghz


info time 26922 nodes 52612628 nps 1954222 hashfull 982
bestmove e2e4 ponder e7e5 

5930K @ 4625 MHz  64 GB DDR4 RAM

[IWB]

My 4 year old i5 2500k

Code: Select all

info time 28934 nodes 52612628 nps 1818366 hashfull 982 
bestmove e2e4 ponder e7e5 

iMac 5K Retina  i7 4.0Ghz 32gb Ram 


info time 29406 nodes 52612628 nps 1789154 hashfull 982 
bestmove e2e4 ponder e7e5 

4930k @ 4.4 ghz


info time 26922 nodes 52612628 nps 1954222 hashfull 982
bestmove e2e4 ponder e7e5 

5930K @ 4625 MHz  64 GB DDR4 RAM


info time 28954 nodes 52612628 nps 1817070 hashfull 982
bestmove e2e4 ponder e7e5

i5 2500k @ 4.4 GHz (16 GB DDR 3 RAM  but that info is useless)

I really have problems justifying a single € for a new PC! there is very little progress with Intel - regarding single core efficency.

Ingo

[shrapnel]

Here is my Komodo 9 Benchmark on my little MONSTER
My specs are in my Signature.

[shrapnel]

Info time 47087 nodes 52612628 nps 1117347 hashfull 982
bestmove e2e4 ponder e7e5
Intel Xeon X5650 12 cores, hyperthreading disabled.

Sorry, no offence, but that's a pretty poor Benchmark for a 12-Core.
No wonder even dual-xeon players fail to beat me....or something wrong with your Hardware.