stockfish 7
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 2821
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:38 pm
- Location: Sortland, Norway
Re: stockfish 7
Once Stockfish 7 is released, it will be outdated few days later due to new developmental version lol.
-
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:59 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: stockfish 7
true but nevertheless there are some good reasons to release an official version
-
- Posts: 2821
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:38 pm
- Location: Sortland, Norway
Re: stockfish 7
Thats right. As far as i know, majority of the raiting lists is using old Stockfish 6.styx wrote:true but nevertheless there are some good reasons to release an official version
-
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2014 9:16 am
Re: stockfish 7
What's the difference really? Most of us just make our own development compiles or download from the site...Jouni wrote:I think one month beta testing like with SF 6 is total overkill! Isn't there 100 000+ games played every day in framework already? Just make fast compile and release it.
-
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2014 9:16 am
Re: stockfish 7
Well quite frankly we do need an official version for the rating lists... Stockfish 6 is falling farther and father behind Komodo in the lists... other than that, I don't see much point to official versions other than for those who want them via personal preference.Nordlandia wrote:Once Stockfish 7 is released, it will be outdated few days later due to new developmental version lol.
-
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:03 pm
Re: stockfish 7
CCRL still has K9.2 vs SF6. K is clearly ahead but I don't think it can pull much further.APassionForCriminalJustic wrote:Well quite frankly we do need an official version for the rating lists... Stockfish 6 is falling farther and father behind Komodo in the lists...
-
- Posts: 3546
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm
Re: stockfish 7
Have you checked the blitz list or the FRC list ?whereagles wrote:CCRL still has K9.2 vs SF6. K is clearly ahead but I don't think it can pull much further.APassionForCriminalJustic wrote:Well quite frankly we do need an official version for the rating lists... Stockfish 6 is falling farther and father behind Komodo in the lists...
-
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:03 pm
Re: stockfish 7
I was only thinking of the 40/40 list, which I feel is the most important TC standard of CCRL.Modern Times wrote:Have you checked the blitz list or the FRC list ?
Had another look and at 40/40 you do have K9.2 vs SF6. Other lists have (stronger) dev versions of SF vs K9.2.
-
- Posts: 41423
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: stockfish 7
Yes, but they tend to be bullet or blitz and/or test a smaller selection of engines.whereagles wrote:Other lists have (stronger) dev versions of SF vs K9.2.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2014 9:16 am
Re: stockfish 7
Oh wow... so clearly with CCRL's hardware and blitz time control Komodo 9.3 is definitely weaker than Stockfish development of November the 25th (Stockfish 251115 64-bit 4CPU). I mostly focus on 40/40 and time controls much longer. But wow. It is absolutely amazing, and thrilling as to just how different engines can be in their respective environments. In TCEC Komodo thrives. But not so much with a four core system at blitz versus Stockfish. It looks like Komodo has gained nothing on the list though. That's a little discouraging.Modern Times wrote:Have you checked the blitz list or the FRC list ?whereagles wrote:CCRL still has K9.2 vs SF6. K is clearly ahead but I don't think it can pull much further.APassionForCriminalJustic wrote:Well quite frankly we do need an official version for the rating lists... Stockfish 6 is falling farther and father behind Komodo in the lists...
Ah well at least Houdini and those below him are getting spanked around.