I think some work was done, in the months, after the release of 4.1 hence the small elo increase. I do not think Vas is involved with CB in an active capacity and F15 is not being, actively, developed by him. CB did a deal to buy what he had as they needed something after the sad retirement of Gyula.Leto wrote:I disagree. CEGT 40/4 has Fritz 15 12CPU at 3174, Rybka 4.1 12CPU at 3129. I tested both with the arasan 18 testsuite at 60 seconds limit and Fritz 15 scored 79.5% with an average time of 8.53s/16.65 whereas Rybka 4.1 scored 75.5% with an average time of 11.61s/14.56.Ozymandias wrote:Specially if you think he's done any work at all on the engine, in the last 4 years. I don't believe that's the case.Nelson Hernandez wrote:It's hard to believe that after ten years since Rybka's first public release (we recently had that anniversary) Vas still hasn't fixed that.
I'd say that strongly points towards work having been done on the engine which provided a measurable elo increase.
Fritz 15 is unsuitable for analysis.
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 11:12 pm
- Location: Whitchurch. Shropshire, UK.
- Full name: Harvey Williamson
Re: Fritz 15 is unsuitable for analysis.
-
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:30 am
Re: Fritz 15 is unsuitable for analysis.
More or less what I've been defending since July. The cited 12 CPU increase, is a clear indicative of what the goal of Rybka's development was, after R3 (cluster optimization).Harvey Williamson wrote:I think some work was done, in the months, after the release of 4.1 hence the small elo increase. I do not think Vas is involved with CB in an active capacity and F15 is not being, actively, developed by him. CB did a deal to buy what he had as they needed something after the sad retirement of Gyula.Leto wrote:I disagree. CEGT 40/4 has Fritz 15 12CPU at 3174, Rybka 4.1 12CPU at 3129. I tested both with the arasan 18 testsuite at 60 seconds limit and Fritz 15 scored 79.5% with an average time of 8.53s/16.65 whereas Rybka 4.1 scored 75.5% with an average time of 11.61s/14.56.Ozymandias wrote:Specially if you think he's done any work at all on the engine, in the last 4 years. I don't believe that's the case.Nelson Hernandez wrote:It's hard to believe that after ten years since Rybka's first public release (we recently had that anniversary) Vas still hasn't fixed that.
I'd say that strongly points towards work having been done on the engine which provided a measurable elo increase.
-
- Posts: 3550
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm
Re: Fritz 15 is unsuitable for analysis.
Yes, that is what I think also. I wonder what they will do for Fritz 16 then ? Will be interesting.Harvey Williamson wrote: I think some work was done, in the months, after the release of 4.1 hence the small elo increase. I do not think Vas is involved with CB in an active capacity and F15 is not being, actively, developed by him. CB did a deal to buy what he had as they needed something after the sad retirement of Gyula.
-
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:30 am
Re: Fritz 15 is unsuitable for analysis.
They don't have many options, people they can turn to, in order to achieve an improvement: Demichev, Houdart or… someone over at the SF camp.Modern Times wrote:Yes, that is what I think also. I wonder what they will do for Fritz 16 then ? Will be interesting.Harvey Williamson wrote: I think some work was done, in the months, after the release of 4.1 hence the small elo increase. I do not think Vas is involved with CB in an active capacity and F15 is not being, actively, developed by him. CB did a deal to buy what he had as they needed something after the sad retirement of Gyula.
-
- Posts: 3618
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:33 pm
Re: Fritz 15 is unsuitable for analysis.
This is just another ChessBase example of treating the consumers as fools, in fact deceive their consumers.Harvey Williamson wrote:I think some work was done, in the months, after the release of 4.1 hence the small elo increase. I do not think Vas is involved with CB in an active capacity and F15 is not being, actively, developed by him. CB did a deal to buy what he had as they needed something after the sad retirement of Gyula.Leto wrote:I disagree. CEGT 40/4 has Fritz 15 12CPU at 3174, Rybka 4.1 12CPU at 3129. I tested both with the arasan 18 testsuite at 60 seconds limit and Fritz 15 scored 79.5% with an average time of 8.53s/16.65 whereas Rybka 4.1 scored 75.5% with an average time of 11.61s/14.56.Ozymandias wrote:Specially if you think he's done any work at all on the engine, in the last 4 years. I don't believe that's the case.Nelson Hernandez wrote:It's hard to believe that after ten years since Rybka's first public release (we recently had that anniversary) Vas still hasn't fixed that.
I'd say that strongly points towards work having been done on the engine which provided a measurable elo increase.
I suggest a New ChessBase Sales Motto:
"Now remember, you can fool some of the people all of the time. These are the ones you need to concentrate on."
The road to chaos is filled with political correctness.
― Tadros
― Tadros
-
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:13 am
Re: Fritz 15 is unsuitable for analysis.
I wonder what they will do for Fritz 16 then ? Will be interesting.
_________________
Repackage Houdini 4 , call it F16 , and bingo , another 100 Elo increase.....
-
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:15 pm
- Location: Long Island, NY, USA
Re: Fritz 15 is unsuitable for analysis.
This probably was asked before, but I never came across it.
Are there other engines out there besides Rybka that are without bishop underpromotion?
Are there other engines out there besides Rybka that are without bishop underpromotion?
-
- Posts: 12541
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Redmond, WA USA
Re: Fritz 15 is unsuitable for analysis.
Fritz 15Norm Pollock wrote:This probably was asked before, but I never came across it.
Are there other engines out there besides Rybka that are without bishop underpromotion?
Those are the only two that I can think of.
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
-
- Posts: 3618
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:33 pm
Re: Fritz 15 is unsuitable for analysis.
WuShock wrote:I wonder what they will do for Fritz 16 then ? Will be interesting.
_________________
Repackage Houdini 4 , call it F16 , and bingo , another 100 Elo increase.....
The road to chaos is filled with political correctness.
― Tadros
― Tadros
-
- Posts: 3618
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:33 pm
Re: Fritz 15 is unsuitable for analysis.
The road to chaos is filled with political correctness.
― Tadros
― Tadros