Hannibal 1.7

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: Harvey Williamson, bob, hgm

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
BubbaTough
Posts: 1154
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 3:18 am

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Post by BubbaTough » Wed Aug 10, 2016 4:50 pm

MikeGL wrote:
Edsel Apostol wrote:What OS are you using? We don't have 32 bit OS anymore so that was not tested.
Windows XP 32 bit.

:oops: pgado daan :oops:

I can try with 64 bit OS, but its not Windows. :lol:
I have to do a new compile for xp. I can do it tomorrow.

Sam

Edsel Apostol
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:53 am
Full name: Edsel Apostol
Contact:

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Post by Edsel Apostol » Wed Aug 10, 2016 5:00 pm

MikeGL wrote:
Edsel Apostol wrote:What OS are you using? We don't have 32 bit OS anymore so that was not tested.
Windows XP 32 bit.

:oops: pgado daan :oops:

I can try with 64 bit OS, but its not Windows. :lol:
Ilonggo ka man? :)

MikeGL
Posts: 962
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:49 pm

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Post by MikeGL » Wed Aug 10, 2016 5:09 pm

BubbaTough wrote:
MikeGL wrote:
Edsel Apostol wrote:What OS are you using? We don't have 32 bit OS anymore so that was not tested.
Windows XP 32 bit.

:oops: pgado daan :oops:

I can try with 64 bit OS, but its not Windows. :lol:
I have to do a new compile for xp. I can do it tomorrow.

Sam
Thanks Sam and Edsel. Excited to try out your engine.
Kind regards


p.s.
oo ed, karay-a takun ; )
check your private msg inbox

IWB
Posts: 1539
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:02 pm

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Post by IWB » Wed Aug 10, 2016 7:29 pm

Just to finish that topic:

3520 games with 10 losses on time. With a performance of 44% that would be about 4 point more in total (in average). That is about 0.3% performance loss ... nothing I would worry about!

Ingo

rainhaus
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:26 pm

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Post by rainhaus » Wed Aug 10, 2016 8:26 pm

You have my respect for keeping your promise so right on time :!: http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... ghlight=me
Simply because of historical reasons Hannibal is to be expected that the pyrenees must not be an obstacle. In this case the engine will push Andscas (from Andorra, Pyrenees) from the 10th place and Naum does not longer belong to the top 16 of the Ipon list.
Subject to the requirement that Hannibal is the Carthaginian commander who crossed the alps and not the cannibalic serial killer!
Thread viewImage
flat view
is a bad view
without thread view

User avatar
cdani
Posts: 2175
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:24 am
Location: Andorra
Contact:

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Post by cdani » Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:04 pm

:-)

Edsel Apostol
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:53 am
Full name: Edsel Apostol
Contact:

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Post by Edsel Apostol » Thu Aug 11, 2016 4:46 am

IWB wrote:Just to finish that topic:

3520 games with 10 losses on time. With a performance of 44% that would be about 4 point more in total (in average). That is about 0.3% performance loss ... nothing I would worry about!

Ingo
Thanks Ingo! Nice to see it in the top 10. Hopefully Daniel don't release new Andscacs soon, else will be out of the top 10. :)

BubbaTough
Posts: 1154
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 3:18 am

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Post by BubbaTough » Sat Aug 13, 2016 11:17 am

I tried a compile for Windows XP. Message me if you want to beta test it for me. As soon as someone tells us it works, we will include it in the download package.

-Sam

MikeGL
Posts: 962
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:49 pm

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Post by MikeGL » Sat Aug 13, 2016 4:28 pm

BubbaTough wrote:I tried a compile for Windows XP. Message me if you want to beta test it for me. As soon as someone tells us it works, we will include it in the download package.

-Sam
Hi Sam,

I am willing to beta test your new Hannibal 1.7 engine. Not sure what are the pre-requisites to qualify though.

But I have a bunch of test suites and games which I could use to check. Most of my test suites are taken from public domain although I have some of my own too, which was slightly tweaked positions from my actual games. I have also just replied to your private msg.

Thanks in advance

User avatar
Rebel
Posts: 5662
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:04 am

Re: Hannibal 1.7

Post by Rebel » Sat Aug 13, 2016 6:40 pm

cdani wrote:Just to comment it, I leave unused upto 3 x increment time, so should be impossible that Andscacs loses on time. If it happens is something of the operating system.
Or a busy PC doing other things.

Post Reply